-
-
September 12, 2018 at 6:17 pm
-
September 13, 2018 at 2:51 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeWhat are you trying to show? I might use colour, change the pathlines numbers or position or maybe use a vector plot. All of these could improve the image without telling me anything else.
When you worked through the geometry, meshing & solver what did you want to show in the results?
-
September 13, 2018 at 4:05 pm
José Mantovani
SubscriberHello rwoolhou, thanks for reply.
So when I worked through the simulation process I want show the comparasion between results by the same geometry, mesh and numerical procedure but with different turbulence models. For flow visualization I want show the differences between the result by the models employed in the recirculation zone. I tried to make this with streamlines because when I use the vector plots the two bubbles that have in this region don't show good, as you can see in the image below.
The vectors plot by k-omega, for me, is very good, but for k-epsilon the primary bubble is almost imperceptible. Also, I tried to make with streamlines because I found this image extracted of a article that also used FLUENT.
Do you know how you could configure to get an image of the current lines like this? I increase the number of lines so they form the bubbles next to the step but they still do not complete and the larger bubble almost becomes one of many lines. Can you change the spacing? I wanted to be able to make an image similar to the above.
It would not necessarily have to have this dimensionless scale, but if I succeeded it would be even more interesting. I do not know if he did this in FLUENT or CFD-Post or maybe in other software.
Thanks,
Mantovani.
-
September 13, 2018 at 4:27 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeIf you want the difference there's a feature in CFD Post to read in two sets of results. Look for Case Comparison in the Help.
The third image isn't from Fluent or CFD Post: depending on the date on the paper it could even be LaTeX. Plotting contours of velocity may give something similar, just don't turn on the filled option.
-
September 13, 2018 at 5:20 pm
José Mantovani
SubscriberOk, I know this feature. LaTex.. Hm... I will see about it. I will try to don't turn on the filled option.
Thanks one more time rwoolhou.
Mantovani.
-
September 14, 2018 at 8:37 am
Rob
Ansys EmployeeYou're welcome. Try answering a few now you're learning: we'll still be here to cover and pick up anything you miss.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
-
2524
-
2066
-
1279
-
1096
-
459
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.