-
-
September 21, 2018 at 1:15 pm
rodmarti
SubscriberI am running an analysis that uses a failure criteria, but, when I visualize the results, the failed elements are shown, messing up the post processing. Is possible to suppress them in the results?
-
September 21, 2018 at 2:13 pm
Sandeep Medikonda
Ansys EmployeeEroded elements should be removed by default. What are your failure criteria?
Turn on, View>Eroded Nodes.
Regards,
Sandeep
-
September 24, 2018 at 11:57 am
rodmarti
SubscriberI used max. strain of 0.16
I misinterpreted the results. The eroded elements are not shown (As you can see in the attached file).
In any case, there are elements that comply with the max strain but are too deformed.
Do you see anything strange in my results?
Thank you.
Rodrigo
-
September 24, 2018 at 2:15 pm
Sandeep Medikonda
Ansys EmployeeIf you are using reduced integration elements, I am not too worried about these. Keep an eye on the Hourglass Energy and on Energy conservation. It looks like these elements have a high aspect ratio even in the refined region, hence the stretching and odd shapes. Look at the mesh quality.
Try a maximum strain of 0.15 and see how much it affects your results. I believe you will see complete separation?
Regards,
Sandeep
-
September 24, 2018 at 4:14 pm
rodmarti
SubscriberI am using low integration elements, so the analysis can run faster.
How can I check the hourglass energy in workbench?
Thanks,
Rodrigo
-
September 24, 2018 at 4:51 pm
Sandeep Medikonda
Ansys EmployeeRodrigo,
You can access this from the solution information. Please see below:
A general rule of thumb is to make sure that the Hourglass Energy is sufficiently small (about 10% of the Internal Energy)
Regards,
Sandeep
-
September 28, 2018 at 2:14 pm
rodmarti
SubscriberThank you Sandeep,
I think I found out what the problem was. It turned out that it was simpler than that.
The erosion control for the material failure was not checked in the analysis settings.
One last question: In that model, I wasn't able to check the reaction forces. Is there another way to do that?
--
Rodrigo
-
September 28, 2018 at 3:54 pm
Sandeep Medikonda
Ansys EmployeeHi Rodrigo,
You can look at it from here:
Also, what version are you using? I would recommend (and personally tested this in) you to use 19.2 and turn on beta features. You can activate beta features from Workbench in Tools>Options>Apperance.
Regards,
Sandeep
-
September 28, 2018 at 3:57 pm
rodmarti
SubscriberSandeep,
I am using version 18.1
I'll check with the university if it is possible to upgrade the version.
Problem solved!
Thank you!
Rodrigo
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- explicit dynamics
- Explicit dynamics ERRORS
- turning simulation
- getting zero maximum and minimum stress value in explicit analysis
- How do get Full values instead of just minimum and maximum ?
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- How to figure out impact force in Explicit Dynamic Analysis
- Running an explicit dynamics simulation on a composite plate
- Which analysis to use for dynamic and quasi-static compression of auxetic structures?
- Euler Domain Restricting Simulation
-
2564
-
2080
-
1299
-
1106
-
459
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.