-
-
May 23, 2023 at 11:54 am
Sebastien Klein
SubscriberHello,
I want to perform a thermomechanical analysis on a model with shell elements. The heat transfer analysis is doing well, I have activated the beta option with thermal variation in the shells. Then I go to the mechanical analysis, I use the import load feature to import the temperature from the heat transfer, but the import does not work, and temperatures applied make no sense (like 1e308 degrees applied on all nodes).
I use ansys v2020 R2. Should any option be activated when temperature variation is accounted for in the shells ?
Thank you for your answers.
-
May 24, 2023 at 12:27 pm
Chandra Sekaran
Ansys EmployeeAs you point out layered thermal shell is a beta feature. The main issue is that when you have only have one layer TEMP is the dof name. When you have more than one layer (shell131/132) the DOF names change to TBOT, TE1, TE2,..,TTOP. Mapping these DOFs to the corresponding layers in a structural analysis as temperature load is not supported yet.
-
May 24, 2023 at 6:34 pm
mjmiddle
Ansys EmployeeThere is a way to map temperatures to the structural analysis if you accept a linear temperature gradient across the thickness. If the mesh is the same in the thermal and structural analysis (Model cells linked) you can use LDREAD in a command snippet. Or use User Defined Results (UDR) in the thermal system for TBOT and TTOP, and export the data. Then use an “External Data” system to import that data, and you can select top and bottom separately for the two imported temperature loads. Note that beta options must be on as well as the Mechanical beta option “Allow thermal variation along shell thickness.”
-
May 25, 2023 at 8:11 am
Sebastien Klein
SubscriberHello all,
thank you very much for your replies. Indeed it works with the ldread command. I also found out that it works if I use the "Painted shell option". Do you know what is the difference between "Painted shell linear variation" and "linear variation" options ?
Now I also have another issue: in my model I have tubes modelled with shell131. On the outer face of the tubes I would like to account for radiation with ambient, and on the inner face of the tube I have surface to surface radation. But Ansys does not allow to have two different radiation load on the same shell element. Do you know a solution for that issue ?
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- User manual
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- material damping and modal analysis
- Colors and Mesh Display
-
5386
-
3375
-
2471
-
1310
-
1022
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.