-
-
September 17, 2023 at 5:02 pm
alavello
Subscriber -
September 18, 2023 at 10:23 am
Timos
Ansys EmployeeHello, the approach you choose will depend on the trade-offs you are willing to make between accuracy and computational cost. At first I would suggest to use HPC options ( Parallel Computing ). Another approach would be to do some approximations to the model based on the desired results. You can perform multiple steady-state simulations with different positions of the inductor relative to the plate (parametric).
-
September 18, 2023 at 2:54 pm
alavello
SubscriberHello. Thanks for your reply. Using HPC is not an option for me because I only have access to a quite limited number of cores. Moreover, this approach is very inefficient and, in my opinion, not reasonable for this kind of simulation.
Steady state solutions are fine for the electromagnetic field (like in Eddy current simulation), but it is not appropriate for the heat transient solution, which has long settling times. For the thermal part, using a transient solver is a must.
I am trying the following approach:
- Set up a parametric model using the motion of the inductor X as parameter.
- For X=0, solve Eddy Current simulation and calculate heat losses.
- Transfer the heat loads to Transient Thermal and solve Transient Thermal between t = 0 s to t = 1 s, keeping constant the heat loads.
- Modify the value of X (which updates the geometry), find new heat loads using Maxwell Eddy Current, and solve transient between t=1 s and t=2 s, taking the solution of step 3 as initial conditions.
- Repeat step 4 until the end of motion.
When I try to connect Maxwell heat loads to Transient Thermal, I get the error message “No field solution for frequency 25000 Hz”. The pictures below show my Workbench setup, the Transient Thermal model tree and the error message. I wonder if something is wrong with my approach.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- simulation completed with execution error on server
- Maxwell, HFSS or Q3D?
- Unable to assign correctly the excitations in a coil
- How to export Ansys Maxwell simulation results for post-processing in matlab or in .csv file
- Intersect errors with model with complex structure
- Running ANSYS HFSS on the HPC (it runs on Linux only)
- Process ‘3dtds’ terminated abnormally
- Error while solving Optimetrics
- Error
- Concept of Interpolation Sweep in HFSS
-
7626
-
4442
-
2953
-
1427
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
The logical approach to obtain the heat load on the plate would be to use Eddy current simulations, but Eddy current has no motion capabilities, so it is not an option either. Any suggestion on how to deal with this problem in Ansys?