Fluids

Fluids

Is this Numerically correct if I define translation velocity to the (plate) wall in fluent?

    • rupatel
      Subscriber
    • Karthik R
      Administrator
      Hello,nAs long as the applied boundary condition is physical, there is nothing stopping you from using a moving wall condition. Out of curiosity, what physics are you attempting to solve here?nKarthikn
    • rupatel
      Subscriber
      Note for moving wall condition- We cannot use the moving wall condition to the model problems where the wall motion concerning the adjacent cell zone has a component that is normal to the wall itself. For such problems, consider using a sliding or dynamic ANSYS Fluent will neglect any normal component of wall motion that we specify using moving wall condition.ncould you please let me know with the perspective of above note my wall condition is correct or not? nIt would be a great discussion if I could discuss my work details on this platform, but really sorry as my work comes under confidentiality issues. nThank you so muchnRuchita Pateln
    • Rob
      Ansys Employee
      The motion you set is just added as a boundary in Fluent. As moving in the x-direction could change the domain shape it's not whether the solver is working correctly but whether you're modelling the correct physics. nAs an aside, will you be publishing this work? n
    • rupatel
      Subscriber
      Hi Rob, nThis is not going to publish, but its somewhat related to my research.nI am trying to reduce my problem in simple form with less variables.n
    • Rob
      Ansys Employee
      That's a good plan: always simplify things to understand them.
Viewing 5 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.