LS Dyna

LS Dyna

LS DYNA J integral for Mixed mode

    • longt8
      Subscriber

      Hello Ansys Support Team,

      I am trying to find the J integral for mix mode. I have an example for mixed mode 1 and 2. When I select the crack opening direction as Y (0,1,0), it should be Mode 1.  Would you let me know is it correct for me to get Mode 2 J integral value by checking the crack open direction as X (1,0,0)? We can see the J integral values for Y (0,1,0) and X (1,0,0) are not the same. Also, would you let me know how can I get the mix mode J integral for this example?

       

       

       

       

      Thank you so much!

       

      Teng

       

       

    • Andreas Koutras
      Ansys Employee

      Hello,

      Please let us know if the following are of any help:

      https://www.dynamore.de/de/download/papers/2015-ls-dyna-europ/documents/sessions-e-5-8/non-linear-fracture-mechanics-in-ls-dyna-and-ls-prepost/view

      J-integral in 3D:
      https://www2.dynamore.se/public/jernberg/jintegral.gif

      J-integral in 2D:
      https://www2.dynamore.se/public/jernberg/jintegral2.gif

      LSPP Help > Documentation


      Thanks

    • longt8
      Subscriber

      Hello,

       

      Thank you so much for your reply. In the two video toturals, I notice the boundary is applied in Y direction. Thus the "Crack opening direction" is seleced as Y (0,1,0). Thus the two video tuturals are desinged for mode 1.  

      I have tried to downloade the docuemnt several times, but the document contens is empty:

      Would let me know how I can let this docuement works?

      I am really appreciate if you would let me know how I can do J integal for mix mode. Is that simpily change the crack opening direction vector? If the nodal displacement around crack is 1 in X and 10 in Y, then the crack opening diection should be (1,10,0) to compute the mix mode 1 and mode 2?

       

      Thank you so much!

       

      Best,

       

      Teng

    • Andreas Koutras
      Ansys Employee

      Hello Teng, 

      The LSPP developer shared the following comment:

      Interesting question.
      I think this is due to a confusion regarding the stress intensity factors KI KII KIII from
      Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM), and the J – integral from non-linear fracture mechanics.
      The J integral is an energy measure, related to the energy released for an infinitesimal increase in
      crack length. It will consider all loading modes (opening, shearing, twisting) “lumped” so to say.

      It will consider mixed mode loading, but it will not be possible to distinguish between the modes.
      If the material response is elastic, the stress intensity factors and the J – integral value will be

      related by

      The implementation in LS-PrePost assumes a traction free crack surface. So, if a contact
      between the crack faces is defined and active (crack closure or shearing with friction) the
      results from LS-PrePost will not be entirely correct. From the images, this does not seem to be
      the case though.

      In LS-PrePost, the two points (crack tip node, crack surface node) and the normal to the
      crack surface (Crack opening direction) will define a local Cartesian coordinate system
      with the origin at the crack tip and the x-axis along the crack surface. This coordinate system
      is used for evaluating the J – integral for cracks with arbitrary orientation. The infinitesimal
      crack length increase is assumed to occur along the local x – direction.

      So in the images, the Crack opening direction must be (0, 1, 0) and it does not depend on the
      loading, only the geometry. If the Crack opening direction is input as (1, 0, 0) incorrect results
      will be obtained (as indicated by the negative J – values in the image).

      I hope this helps.

    • Andreas Koutras
      Ansys Employee

      Regarding the documentation:

      You can get both documentation and tutorials by going to Help in LS-PrePost and click on Documentation and Tutorial, respectively.  First time you click on it, LS-PrePost will have to download the files but afterwards they are ready to use without downloading again.

      After these files are downloaded, they need to be placed in the "resource/HelpDocument" subdirectory beneath the LSPP executable location. 

    • longt8
      Subscriber

      Hello Andreas,

       

      Thank you so much for your reply in detail and I really appreciate it! I can read the LSPP help docuement now.

      However, I still have questions for J integtal in LSPP which confused me for long time. In the figure below, the left one is designed for Mode1 J integral and right one is designed for mode 2 J integal. The left one which is for Mode 1 has loading in position Y direction on the top and the total fixed boundary on the bottom. The right one which is for Mode 2 has loading in position X direction on the top and the total fixed boundary on the bottom.

      Would you let me know if the crack opening direction vector for both case is (0,1,0) or (sin theta, cos theta,0)?

      The vector (sin theta, cos theta,0) seem make more sense and agree with the docuement, but toturals(https://www2.dynamore.se/public/jernberg/jintegral.gif and www2.dynamore.se/public/jernberg/jintegral2.gif )above use (0,1,0) for not perfect crack example

      Thank you so much!

      Best,

      Teng

    • Andreas Koutras
      Ansys Employee

      Hello,

      In the previous reply, the developer had explained:

      "The J integral is an energy measure, related to the energy released for an infinitesimal increase in crack length. It will consider all loading modes (opening, shearing, twisting) “lumped” so to say. It will consider mixed mode loading, but it will not be possible to distinguish between the modes ...

      The infinitesimal crack length increase is assumed to occur along the local x – direction. So in the images, the Crack opening direction must be (0, 1, 0) and it does not depend on the loading, only the geometry. "

      I believe this should answer your question.

       

       

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.