March 1, 2022 at 11:21 amtatimaesSubscriber
Hi everyone, I am still around trying to figure out the last steps of my model, I am very close to my thesis submission and still have to go through the results phase, I'll appreciate your help on the following:
For my model, I am using the open channel submodel and pressure inlet/outlet as boundary conditions where I specified velocity and water level from my geometry.
I am struggling a lot on understanding why the discharge that implicitly I'm giving as an input with these boundary conditions, is not the same after the simulation? The discharge - Q50 I have from the river is 1600m3/s, but in the report fluxes mass flow rate the discharge is ~1800m3/s (I reached mass balance). What does it mean?
- I tried several simulations, and the discharge does not get closer to 1600m3/s
- What about roughness? my domain is very large, my mesh is not fine everywhere, only in desired points (I'm using a student license). I did simulations with smooth walls and also with values of ks for wall banks and wall bed (they are different)
- ks - wall river bed: I got it from D50 of sand grain size for the river
- ks - wall river banks: typical values of ks for this type of river
- I computed water heigh (the free surface level at the inlet) from the manning formula knowing discharge-Q50 and slope. Does it affect my solution? the fact that I am using 'n' of manning from literature for this type of river? and fluent takes roughness from the law wall equation?
- I know very little about it, but can that wall lifting be happening?
What I am missing? or what should I look at carefully?
I will be grateful to read your answers and any suggestions you may have.
Thank you very muchMarch 1, 2022 at 12:01 pmRobAnsys EmployeeYou're adding 1600m3/s through the inlet. As VOF tends to be transient, how's the volume of water in the domain doing? Ie if you're losing more than you're adding is the domain water volume also decreasing?
March 1, 2022 at 12:52 pmMarch 1, 2022 at 1:21 pmRobAnsys EmployeeThat's still stabilising. You'll see a mismatch until the volume report stabilises. The question you now need to consider is whether that alters the flow around the bit you're interested in.
March 1, 2022 at 1:44 pmtatimaesSubscriberThanks, Rob
So, if I get your point
I should check the mass flow rate with a higher simulation time to reach stationary?
I am guessing the difference in discharge will affect water level and velocities around the structures I placed. But I am not sure, I guess for that I need the results on both cases to compare...
Just to be sure: those comments I made above about roughness do they interfere with it? Or not for this case.
Viewing 4 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.