December 8, 2020 at 12:39 amDannyOukSubscriberHello, nI am currently working on modelling a multiphase flow system in FLUENT with water as the primary phase and two phases for air (which are differentiated by bubble size) . I am trying to model mass transfer between the two phases of air using user-defined functions (UDFs). nMy first question: Is there a difference between modeling mass transfer terms through the Phase Interaction menu as opposed to applying source terms to the two air phases in the Cell Zone Conditions menu? Is either version preferable to the other? nSecond question: I know that these two different methods result in a slightly different writing for the UDFs (different macros: Define_Mass_Transfer vs. Define_Source). However, when using the source term method, I had two source term UDFs (1 UDF for each group). But if I apply mass transfer terms through the Phase Interaction menu, do I need only 1 mass transfer mechanism that acts as the net sum of mass transferred from group 1 air bubbles to group 2 air bubbles? nThanks for all your help! nSincerely,nDannyn
December 8, 2020 at 11:39 amDrAmineAnsys Employee1/Preferable to use UDF with DEFINE_MASS_TRANSFER or the linearzied version of it. Only one is required whereas for the cell zone source terms you require more..n2/Why not using Population Balance here for the air phasesn
December 8, 2020 at 2:05 pmDannyOukSubscriberThank you! I'm currently trying to model this system using interfacial area transport equations rather than the population balance models. nSincerely, nDannyn
December 9, 2020 at 4:47 pmDannyOukSubscriberHello, nI'm currently trying to apply a mass transfer UDF for this system. Is there any benefit to using the linearized mass transfer UDF terms? nI have applied both types and both seem to have great difficulty reaching convergence. nSincerely, nDannyn
December 10, 2020 at 10:20 amRobForum ModeratorI think linearised is more stable, but other than looking in the mass transfer section of the manual I'm not sure. n
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.