TAGGED: material-properties
-
-
August 29, 2023 at 6:54 pm
Oleg Makarov
SubscriberHello! I want to use the SPG method to simulate brittle fracture with UMAT. I use UMAT to define my material model with failure criterion and MAT_ADD_DAMAGE_GISSMO to add failure mechanics to the model. My material model doesn't include any plastic behavior, only elastic deformation + failure criterion. Failure criterion quantity is written in the history variable hsv(2). I want to know how can I configure MAT_ADD_DAMAGE_GISSMO to define failure when hsv(2) becomes equal to 1 (hsv(2) = 1).
Am I correct that I have to set DTYPE=20 + DCRIT=1 + simple LCSDG curve = {-1, 1 ; 1, 1}? Other parameters are default.
I tried this setup but got the failure of material at D = 0.7 and hsv(2) = 0.91. Why? Where is the error?
-
August 30, 2023 at 11:16 pm
Ushnish Basu
Ansys EmployeeFor brittle fracture, you can directly set the failure flags in the user material code. See the section on "Failure" in Appendix A of the Keyword Manual, and also look in the umat code for how failel or failels is set
GISSMO provides ductile fracture using an evolving damage quantity, as described in the manual
Also, can I presume from this post that you have managed to compile the usermat package successfully on Windows?
-
August 31, 2023 at 1:39 am
Oleg Makarov
SubscriberThank you for your answer!
However in one of my previous questions (see https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/spg-method-with-umat/) developer noted that "SPG can use effective plastic strain, first principle stress, maximum shear strain or GISSMO damage value as bond failure criterion" and "SPG with UMAT has not been fully tested". Therefore will "failel" will work well for SPG like in FEM?
GISSMO worked very well when I tried to use it with SPG and MAT_PICEWISE_LINEAR_PLASTICITY. I set DTYPE = 0, LCSDG curve with very small failure plastic strains, and failure looked great. But now I want to use my own failure criterion without using plastic strains but history variable. When I set DTYPE = 20 and LCSDG curve = {-1, 1 ; 1, 1} (to define critical history variable values) failure looks strange. I simulate uniaxial compression of the cylindrical specimen and at some moment my specimen fails when hsv = 0.91 and D = 0.7 (on the next time step D rapidly increases to 3.994). I don't know where is the problem. Please see the pictures below. There are screenshots of hsv(2) and hsv(30) in timesteps just before and after the fracture occurred. Hsv(2) is driving history variable for fracture in GISSMO and hsv(30) is the damage value (ND history variable in GISSMO). hsv(2) is equal to hsv(34) (ND+4 in GISSMO) therefore everything should work well but it is not.
P.S.: I compiled LS-Dyna on Ubuntu, not Windows.
-
August 31, 2023 at 5:53 am
Oleg Makarov
SubscriberI checked failel without GISSMO. If (hsv(2).gt.1.) then failel = .true. The results are even more strange. Right now “failure” (if I can call it like that) occurs when hsv(2) = 0.97 and the stress distribution becomes not uniform. And in the same time, the specimen remains solid like particles are still bonded and there is no material spalling.
-
-
September 16, 2023 at 2:50 am
Ushnish Basu
Ansys EmployeeThe developer said the following: "Users cannot use both FEM failure way and SPG failure. SPG uses IDAM in *SECTION_SOLID_SPG to define the failure criteria. SPG doesn't support other failure criteria except the criteria defined in IDAM. IDAM=0 defines the GISSMO damage value as the SPG failure. Meanwhile, DTYPE=0 to turn off damage effect in material." I take that to mean that the failel setting in the umat will not be applicable, but I am clarifying that point.
I will make a couple of suggestions for now:
- Use a Dev version of the code instead of R14, in case this is due to a bug in SPG that might have been fixed
- Print the relevant variables at each computational timestep from within the umat routine for some specific element, since the failure may have occured between the timesteps recorded in d3plot. Alternatively, use a curve to output d3plot at the computational timestep around the time of failure
-
September 16, 2023 at 2:57 am
Ushnish Basu
Ansys EmployeeAlso, I would suggest not specifying DCRIT, but only DTYP and LCSDG
-
September 20, 2023 at 6:59 am
Ushnish Basu
Ansys EmployeeAfter further checking, the developer said that SPG does not support user materials, unfortunately. I have asked him to consider implementing it
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Explicit dynamics ERRORS
- explicit dynamics
- turning simulation
- getting zero maximum and minimum stress value in explicit analysis
- How to figure out impact force in Explicit Dynamic Analysis
- How do get Full values instead of just minimum and maximum ?
- Running an explicit dynamics simulation on a composite plate
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- Euler Domain Restricting Simulation
- How to solve Energy error too large
-
7592
-
4438
-
2951
-
1427
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.