November 2, 2023 at 7:59 amAras karimiSubscriber
Hi to all,
I am working on a 3D airfoil. Currently, I am doing a mesh independence study to assess the dependence of the simulation results.
For this purpose, I plot the two parameters CL and CD when calculating. My solver is Fluent and I use K-W SST turbulence model. My mesh is the structure that I produced in icem-cfd.
I first started with a 552K cell mesh with Y+ <1 , and the residuals converged very well. which is according to the following figure:
Now, I increased the number of grid cells to 1,263,000 cells, but unfortunately, this time, the residuals fluctuate strongly and do not intend to converge, and I also receive the message (Stabilizing pressure coupled to enhance linear solver robustness.) repeatedly when solving, which is as follows:
I really wonder why this is happening. To create a new mesh, I did not change the growth rate of the block lines at all, and only increased the number of nodes of the block lines, and at the end, I checked the mesh quality parameters, which were very good.
Mesh 1: (has very good convergence)
Aspect Ratio: 1-5700
Determinant : 0.87-1
Orthogonal Quality: 0.82-1
Mesh 2: (has very bad convergence)
Aspect Ratio: 1-5660
Determinant : 0.895-1
Orthogonal Quality: 0.837-1
If you pay attention, you can see that even the quality of the second mesh is a little better than the first mesh, but its convergence is much worse and full of (Stabilizing pressure coupled to enhance linear solver robustness.) messages.
The aspect ratio of the network is as follows, which shows the elements behind the airfoil:
Now, I increased the network behind the airfoil and found that my non-convergence problem was solved:
See, with the increase in the number of cells behind the airfoil, my network has increased from 1,263,000 cells to 2,000,000 cells, which takes time to solve. If this amount of cell increase is applied on the surface of the airfoil, it gives much more accurate results than applying at the back of the airfoil.
In many papers, I have seen that the mesh behind the airfoil is gradually enlarged up to the outlet pressure boundary condition, which is as follows: but it gives me a message of non-convergence.
Why do I have to make the grid behind the airfoil so small to solve the problem of its non-convergence? Do you have a method or an idea to solve the problem of its high aspect ratio without increasing the cells behind the airfoil?
Thanks in advance
November 2, 2023 at 8:03 amAras karimiSubscriber
Are the ratios appropriate and correct?
November 3, 2023 at 2:23 ammjmiddleAnsys Employee
3D Design is the wrong channel for this post. You should create the post under the Fluids channel.
November 3, 2023 at 6:01 amAras karimiSubscriber
So please delete this post.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- How to work with STL file?
- Rotate tool in ANSYS Design Modeler
- section plane
- Using Symmetry in DesignModeler and Expanding the Results
- ANSYS FLUENT – Operation would result in non manifold bodies
- drawing a geometry by importing a table of points
- material properties
- Coordinates orientation
- “contact pair has no element in it.” how to resolve this problem
- Parameters not imported into Workbench 18.2 from Solidworks/Inventor
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.