TAGGED: 3D Printing, meshing, topology-optimization
-
-
July 3, 2023 at 1:28 pm
Nikos Zoupas
SubscriberHello,
I'm using Ansys for the topology optimization of an object in order to be printed. So after the topology optimization, I want to fill the object with a lattice structure through spaceclaim. After this process I'm trying to mesh the model but, the minimum element quality is too low (near to zero). For the mesh I use tetrahedron method with element size of 2mm, note that the programm doesn't let me use the previous settings of the first static analysis. How can I improve the mesh, if someone has any ideas please let me know.
-
July 7, 2023 at 12:31 am
mjmiddle
Ansys EmployeeAre you using the patch independent tetrahedral mesher? I think that's probably the only one that will work well with the latticed, facetted geometry from a topology optimization. There are not clearly defined surface patches so the patch dependent tetrahedral mesher will normally fail on this type of geometry. It sounds like you have just set a body size. You should try to get as much as you can from the global mesh settings, such as using the curvature sizing and maybe also proximity. Set an appropriate minimum curvature size. Use mesh defeaturing to merge node across small problems, and you can experiment with that value also. Set the quality to standard mechanical rather than the default aggressive mechanical:
If you have defined face patches, you can set more local sizes, like face and edge sizing at the problem location.
Also, when you set a mesh metric, it will show a histogram. You can change the X and Y axes to see the lowest bar best and adjust that lowest bar to just have a few elements using the "Controls":
Then select that lowest histogram bar. It is always important to visualize why those worse elements are forming that way. You must undertsand what's happening in those locations. Then you can use a different mesh size in that location (vertex/edge sizing or sphere of influence body sizing), or modify geometry, or maybe use Virtual Topology or different defeature size, etc...
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.Â

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- User manual
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- Defining rigid body and contact
- Colors and Mesh Display
-
7742
-
4502
-
2957
-
1449
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.