TAGGED: gear, spur-gear, transient-structural
February 17, 2023 at 11:15 amKlearchos TerposSubscriber
I am trying to model the following problem I encountered in a gear test rig:
As shown in the first picture, we have two gears under pretension in a still state.
As shown in the second picture, we now apply a known external torque and the system marginally starts moving. What happens is that the compressed tooth flanks create a static friction moment which inhibits motion. As soon as the static friction becomes kinetic the system starts moving.
What I am aiming for is to find the value of the pretension torque.
As far as ANSYS is concerned, I have the gear models ready as I used them in setting up a static structural simulation. Hence, the mesh and frictional contact between the meshing tooth flanks is set and ready.
However, for this study I will need to use transient structural. I have added my boundary conditions (a very small rotational speed for each gear and the known external torque) but I am unsure of how to proceed with the supports in order to get the desired results.
What supports or boundary conditions would you use?
You can see my setup so far in the following picture:
Thank you for helping out!
February 17, 2023 at 5:56 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
Why do you say "for this study I will need to use transient structural"?
Other than a brief period when the frictional force transitions from sticking to slipping, it is essentially a statics problem with no significant inertial forces. You are using very low velocities.
If the static friction and dynamic friction are the same value, then there is no release of strain energy when the slipping begins so no significant inertial forces develop.
I suggest you use a Static Structural model. Both gears have a Revolute Joint to Ground on the hole ID. One gear has a Joint Load of Rotation, the other gear has a Joint Load of Moment.
A multistep analysis is used. In step 1, the Rotation is set to 0, holding that gear fixed, and the Moment is ramped up to the 40 Nm torque. At some point in step 1, the contact goes from sticking to slipping.
In step 2, a small rotation is ramped on. Sliding continues and the contact point moves up or down the tooth, depending on which tooth you are looking at.
February 18, 2023 at 10:57 pmKlearchos TerposSubscriber
Thank you for your reply!
I think I have followed your instructions precisely. The simulation has run, but I how exactly can I probe/calculate the pretension torque I am looking for and which causes the gears to require such a high moment to move that little?
February 18, 2023 at 11:04 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
One gear has a moment load, the other gear rotates to move that load. You can Probe the Reaction Moment on the Joint that has the rotational input. If you put 40 Nm as a torque load on one gear, the driving gear with the rotational input will probe with a higher value. The size of the torque depends on the shape of the gear tooth and the coefficient of friction you assigned to the contact.
February 19, 2023 at 10:20 am
February 21, 2023 at 6:45 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
What direction is the rotation of the driven gear? Is it advancing against the moment on the other gear or is it retreating from the moment on the other gear? Those two directions of rotation will have a different reaction moment if there is a significant friction on the tooth contact. If the contact is frictionless, then the moment will be the same in each direction.
February 22, 2023 at 1:42 pmKlearchos TerposSubscriber
Thank you for your time. It is advancing against the moment. I 've experimented with many configurations, but I haven't managed to get the pretension moment to show up. All I am getting is 40 Nm and I reckon it is quite impossible for the pretension to coincide with the external moment.
Here are there settings of the frictional contact:
February 22, 2023 at 7:05 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
I just remembered something about involute gear teeth profiles. Ideally, they don't slide, they roll on each other. That means the friction would not change the answer and the correct output torque is identical to the load of 40 Nm.
Now if you have a non-involute tooth face (a bad idea) then you will get sliding at the contact point and then the direction of rotation will make a difference.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- User manual
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- Colors and Mesh Display
- material damping and modal analysis
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.