-
-
May 8, 2023 at 1:37 pm
Leonid Pascar
SubscriberHi,
I am using Mode Expnasion monitor with Inverse design. I try to understnd the results of the ModeMatch class that are based on the Mode Expansion Monitior https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034902433-Using-and-understanding-Mode-Expansion-Monitors . Is it correct to assume the T-Forward represnts the relative transmission to a selected mode? For instance, if T_forward to the fundmental is 0.999, is it correct to assume the relative power coupled to the other modes is 0.001?
Modematch class: Doues it account also for propagation loss? or it only claclutes the spatial overlap in a given plane (without accounting for the propagation loss)?
Thanks,
Leonid
-
May 15, 2023 at 1:26 am
Taylor Robertson
Ansys EmployeeHello Leonid,
I think your understanding is correct the mode expansion monitor simply calculates the overlap with the fields as measured by the monitor with modes of the guiding structure as calculated from the mode expansion monitor. You can specify different modes in the same expansion monitor as well to get the power to TE and TE1 for example. For multiple planes along a lossy waveguide you could see the overall transmission drop, and the T_fwd drop by a similar amount. Although T_fwd doesn't really tell you the propogation loss directly, you could get an idea be measuring the difference at multiple points along the propogation direction. This is unecessary in most cases because the transverse structure is invariant along the propogation direction. Furthermore, you can actually calculate the propogation loss directly from the propogation constant; ie the imagninary part of the refractive index. If this is small, the mode will propogate with effectively the same T_fwd for some distance.
In reality you could have other effects like coupling to other modes, or bending loss etc that are not contained in the propogation constant; however, for single mode waveguides you can usually safely assume that T_fwd is the ratio of power in the mode to input power. This is how you would extract S-params. Finally the difference between T and T_fwd is equal to the power that is scattered through the monitor.
I hope this was enlightening.
-Taylor
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Error on Lumerical device
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Transmission results greater than one
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Finding your Ansys (or Lumerical) account number
- Is there a Lumerical script command to output the Simulation and Memory requirements?
- Ansys Insight: Why my simulation result is different from published paper or experiment?
-
5242
-
3299
-
2469
-
1308
-
988
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.