May 3, 2021 at 6:54 pmChris KopetskiAnsys Employee
Simulating MoS2 (0.615nm thick) on a layer of Graphene requires an extremely small mesh when using standard 3D material models. I think the 2D object and material model (i.e. https://support.lumerical.com/hc/en-us/articles/360042244874-Graphene-surface-conductivity-material-model) are better for this type of simulation. I get sensible results for MoS2 and Graphene on their own, but combining them in a single simulation doesn't work.
Note: I took the values for dielectric constant of MoS2 from http://journals.aps.org/prb/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.205422
Question migrated from the Lumerical KXMay 3, 2021 at 7:05 pmChris KopetskiAnsys EmployeeThe main advantage of using 2D objects to model thin layers like Graphene is that it allows you to use a mesh size that's much larger than the layer thickness. For example, you might use a 10nm mesh, even though the physical thickness of the graphene is 1nm. However, this doesn't work if you have two very thin layers. The algorithm can only handle one '2D material' for each mesh point. The meshing algorithm basically sees the two objects (graphene & MoS2) as being directly on top of each other. The end result is that one is ignored.
Unfortunately, I don't think you'll be able to use two 2D materials directly on top of each other. I can think of two possible solutions, although I must admit that I'm not sure which one is better.
Use a 2D material model for one of the materials (i.e. Graphene) and a bulk 3D model for the other (i.e. MoS2). This will require a small mesh to resolve the bulk 3D material, but it should allow you to correctly model the system.
Create a single 'effective' 2D material model that represents the behavior of the combined graphene-MoS2 structure. The advantage of this approach is that it would allow you to use a larger mesh size. However, it would require some thought and careful testing to determine if it's possible to create such a model that accurately represents the combined materials.
Viewing 1 reply thread
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Error on Lumerical device
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Ansys Insight: Transmission results greater than one
- Ansys Insight: Convergence issues in CHARGE
- Is there a Lumerical script command to output the Simulation and Memory requirements?
Top Rated Tags
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.