-
-
May 30, 2023 at 1:15 pm
Samuele Luigetti
SubscriberHello,
using MSUP method for harmonic analysis of a rotating structure, the gyrioscopic effect are considered? Since it's not possible to set Coriolis effect ON in MSUP analysis.
-
May 31, 2023 at 2:04 pm
Dave Looman
Ansys EmployeeExample 7.4 in the APDL Rotordynamics Guide is a mode-sup harmonic with coriolis on in just the modal.
-
May 31, 2023 at 2:15 pm
Samuele Luigetti
Subscriberyes, i have also coriolis on in the linked modal, but this is only to consider the changing in natural frequencies value. My suspect is that the harmonic consider that frequency constant, not variable with the rotational velocity (i.e. the sweep frequency)
-
-
May 31, 2023 at 2:40 pm
Dave Looman
Ansys EmployeeYes, if you are solving for a frequency range, the coriolis effect won't be adjusted based on the frequency. That's an APDL limitation of the SYNCHRO command.
-
May 31, 2023 at 2:47 pm
Samuele Luigetti
Subscriberok thanks, anyway i'm working on workbench but i think it's the same. So, what do you suggest to take the coriolis effect into account for harmonic (except the full method)?
-
-
May 31, 2023 at 3:03 pm
Dave Looman
Ansys EmployeeI don't see an alternative to using the full method. Any reason not to use the full method?
-
May 31, 2023 at 3:17 pm
Samuele Luigetti
SubscriberIt's a bit complicated,, but i try to explain. The fact is that i have frequency of load different respect rotational velocity. So in the MSUP i set the sweep frequency equal to rotational velocity multiplied by ratio ( where ratio Fr load/Fr rotation), and the analysis take into account the natural frequencies of the linked modal with certain rotational velocity and then in post processing i correct all with the campbell diagram (beacuse the frequency response are not correct due to te fact that the coriolis effect are not take into account). With the full i cannot do this because there is not a linked modal so there's not some natural frequencies referred to a certain velocity (meanwhile in the other case yes). The perfect case would be an harmonic analysis that take into account the coriolis effect and with the possiblity at the same time to have different frequency between load and velocity, but i do not think that's exist.
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- User manual
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- Defining rigid body and contact
- Colors and Mesh Display
-
7588
-
4434
-
2951
-
1423
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.