May 15, 2023 at 10:10 amtosuccessSubscriber
I'm experimenting about a negative pressure device.
I used the pressure inlet and exhaust fan outlet, and assiged a gauge pressure value of 0 [Pa] and -2.5 [Pa] to those values, respectively.
In addition, I used default values for other values, but the residuals do not converge and diverge.
Can you point out the problem in my project?
May 15, 2023 at 2:31 pmRobAnsys Employee
May 16, 2023 at 6:52 amNickFLSubscriberIf you want help, we would need a little bit more details. The fact of the matter is, the inlet pressure & outlet pressure boundary conditions are inherently unstable because we have no condition that connects the velocity and the pressure. A better approach would be to specify a mass flow and a pressure and iterate the mass flow until you achieve the pressure drop you want.
May 17, 2023 at 6:06 amtosuccessSubscriber
I have a question.
Should I use the 'mass-flow-outlet' condition at the boundary conditions if I know the air volume (Q) for the initial condition?
May 17, 2023 at 11:00 amNickFLSubscriber
- Yes, if you have the volumetric flow rate, and assuming you know the density, then the mass flow rate can be computed. This can be set at the boundary condition, or you could convert it to a velocity condition.
- You mentioned that you have an exhaust fan outlet, have you validated that the polynomial coefficients are correct? Perhaps it is best if you switch this to the mass-flow-outlet and use the value you computed from above.
May 18, 2023 at 2:25 amtosuccessSubscriber
Then, do I have to turn the simulation while changing the inlet condition by fixing the outlet setting?
May 18, 2023 at 7:34 amNickFLSubscriber
I am a bit unsure on your question. If you specify the mass flow rate (from the volumetric) you would compute the corresponding pressure drop through the domain. If you are certain of this flow rate, then we would not need to iterate because you know it.
It really depends on what you are trying to model and what known boundary conditions you have. Earlier you stated that you knew the pressure difference, and later added you knew the volumetric flow rate. Mathematically we cannot specify all three (look at the NS equations and BCs closely--it is not possible). A general approach would be take it to model it with two (mass flow & a pressure are the best) and use the third (other pressure) as a validation point. But best approach we cannot exactly say without knowing all the details.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.