-
-
September 1, 2019 at 4:06 am
Doba
Subscriber -
September 1, 2019 at 4:37 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberI recommend you go back to the geometry editor and add a blend radius to every point of every triangle. That will allow the inflation to smoothly work its way around each triangle "vertex" because there will be a tangent curve to wrap around.
-
September 2, 2019 at 7:34 am
Doba
SubscriberYou mean every edge? As the flow is facing the triangular top of the prisms, I am thinking of adding blend radius only to edges along that, not the perpendicular edges as their sharpness isn't affecting the inflation (I hope that was understandable)
-
September 2, 2019 at 10:41 am
Rob
Ansys EmployeeIf you're meshing inside the beam structure too reduce the minimum cell size: part of your problem is how the inflation is interacting with the background cell size.
-
September 2, 2019 at 5:45 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberIn a 2D view, each triangle has a vertex or point at the corner. In 3D extrusion of that 2D view, that vertex becomes an edge. Yes, I mean every edge at the vertex.
rwoolhou makes a good point to use smaller elements on the faces that are not triangles. You could pick all the sides of the triangle and bias the nodes to each vertex. That would also help.
-
September 3, 2019 at 12:42 pm
Doba
Subscriber
If you're meshing inside the beam structure too reduce the minimum cell size: part of your problem is how the inflation is interacting with the background cell size.
You mean the "Element size" or "Curvature/Proximity min size"?
-
September 3, 2019 at 12:44 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeYes, either, both. Have a look at the sizes compared with your model and alter to suit.
-
September 7, 2019 at 6:32 am
Doba
SubscriberSo I have tried adding blend radius and reduce the minimum cell size (along with some other settings like growth rate and defeature size) but I still can't get it right.
From the 2nd image you can see that the worst elements are near the bottom and top of the prism. This is where the inflation layers are starting to form. I noticed that the section where all layers have been "set", there are hardly any bad elements.
Do you guys have any other tips?
-
September 9, 2019 at 12:04 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeTry one layer only, and further increase the resolution on the solid faces/volume.
-
September 9, 2019 at 12:54 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberSince the worst elements are where the inflation layers start and end, try slicing the fluid volume at those two planes (and form a multibody part to use shared topology) then mesh that body first (selective body meshing). If you slice the volume that way, does that make that body sweepable? If so, you would have a face to mesh and then sweep along with mostly hex elements.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- ANSYS Workbench Measuring within Design
- how to improve the inflation quality at sharp corners?
- check element type
- The mesh file exporter could not resolve cyclic dependencies in overlapping contact regions error
- How to resolve Mesh Failure
- Meshing Error
- Error in meshing
- Conformal vs Non-Conformal Mesh
- execution error inside the mesher. The process suffered an unhandled exception or ran out of memory
- inflation created stairstep mesh at some location
-
2524
-
2064
-
1279
-
1096
-
456
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.