Tagged: fluent, optimization, parametric-analysis
-
-
February 26, 2023 at 3:29 pm
daniel azouri
SubscriberHi everyone,
I am working on a 2-D parametric aerodynamic analysis of an airfoil profile and flaps, part of our FSAE project. the relative geometric parameters that define the configuration are defined in the workbench. (angle of attack, gap, ovelap..)
what ansys optimization app and method would you recommend to use for this wide range of configurations, and to be through as well and not done manually to get the best lift/drag ratio?
Thank you
-
February 27, 2023 at 2:54 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeI'd probably look at the Adjoint and optimisation tools in Fluent. So, not the approach you're taking via Workbench. How is a different question, and not one I can answer.
-
February 27, 2023 at 8:37 pm
daniel azouri
SubscriberHi Rob, yes i want to use the possiblities for optimization by fluent, but the input parameters are of the design modeler, not sure they can be accessed within fluent.
-
-
February 28, 2023 at 9:25 am
Rob
Ansys EmployeeThat's the whole point. There are two approaches:
- The parameter option (your current choice) which needs a load of models to then give a response surface. You then find the "best" solution and refine the surface to work out the parameters. Advantage is you see all of the design space, disadvantage is it's lots of runs.
- Adjoint and morphing move the Fluent mesh to get the "best" result. You don't generally see the rejected designs. Advantage, it's computationally very efficient; disadvantage you don't see the response surface and poor choice of guidelines can result in some interesting results.
-
February 28, 2023 at 10:44 am
daniel azouri
Subscriberyet to use the second method, using the same defined parameters at the geometry level, is possible? also is it limited to a local optimum? thank you!
-
February 28, 2023 at 11:06 am
Rob
Ansys EmployeeThe second method uses stuff in Fluent rather than DM so avoids CAD changes and remeshing. I don't know the full set up or limitations, please refer to the User's Guide & Theory Manual.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
-
3654
-
2534
-
1745
-
1226
-
580
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.