August 5, 2022 at 7:54 amshawnSubscriber
I am working on a simulation (varFDTD in MODE) of a taper structure (see the attached schematics) to calculate the loss. But I found something weird.
I use a mode source in the simulation. However, the transmission spetrum (see the attached figure) at the output (green line) is greater than that at the input port (blue line), which from my perspective is not reasonable.
I have tried several ways, e.g., increasing simulation time, the number of the PML layers and the mesh accuracy to deal with this issue, but all in vain. Is there any idea to solve this issue?
Let me know if more detail is needed.
Here are some screenshots of the settings in the simulation.
August 5, 2022 at 8:25 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
You may need to do the following modifications:
1: significantly increase the mode source size, not to truncate the field amplitude
2: for the input and output waveguides, since they are straight, you only need to simulate half wavelength or shorter.
3: make sure the mode is what you need. Please check its polarization
4: make sure the green reference point is inside the waveguide.
Please try again. This structure should not have strong resonance, so autoshutoff min 1e-5 and simulation time1000fs of the default values should be sufficient.
August 8, 2022 at 9:35 amshawnSubscriber
Thank you for the reply!
I have tried to improve the simulation based on your suggestions. As you can see in the attached screenshot below, the span of the mode source is significantly increased and extended beyond the boundary of the varFDTD region. And the mode I selected in the mode source is just the fundamental TE mode. Unfornately, the output transmission is sometimes greater than the input one (since it becomes sinusoidal), alothough the difference is quite small.
I also check the field profile (see the figure below) at the input and output monitors and the fields look fine and not truncated.
And I found that increasing the distance between the boundary of varFDTD region and the output monitor at the right hand side will let shape of the output transmission spectrum less sinusoidal. So I am not sure if this indicates that the simualtion region should be much larger than that you suggested in point 2?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Error on Lumerical device
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Convergence issues in CHARGE
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Lumerical support has moved to the Ansys Learning Forum (ALF)
- Is there a Lumerical script command to output the Simulation and Memory requirements?
- focusing efficiency