-
-
May 7, 2023 at 8:11 pm
minchunh
SubscriberHello,
I'm modeling a tension specimen under displacement control by applying prescribed displacement to the node set, while from the output data, the motion of the node set is not moving as I prescribed. I'm using solid element -1. I wonder if anyone faced this kind of problem before?
Thanks,
Min-Chun
-
May 8, 2023 at 1:15 pm
Armin_A
SubscriberHi Min-Chun,
Could you please provide more information regarding your model?
For example, what LS-DYNA card do you use to apply the motion? Do you use *BOUNDARY_PRESCRIBED_MOTION_SET?
Do you apply displacement to the specimen's end along the right direction? Do you constrain the other end of the specimen to resemble a fixed clamped condition? -
May 8, 2023 at 5:10 pm
minchunh
SubscriberHi Armin,
Yes, I'm using *BOUNDARY_PRESCRIBED_MOTION_SET as well as applying fixed-clamped conditions to the other end. Also, at the end of applying the prescribed motion, Boundary_spc is also applied to constrain the DOFs other than the direction under displacement control. I tried applying other magnitudes of the cyclic displacements, but the problem only occurs when certain prescribed displacement curves are used (i.e., this issue does not always occur, which is weird).
-
May 8, 2023 at 5:57 pm
Armin_A
SubscriberThanks Min-Chun.
I see. As you indicated, it's odd that the issue does not always occur. I would suggest that you remove the BOUNDARY_SPC card for now to focus on ensuring the *BOUNDARY_PRESCRIBED_MOTION_SET is working properly. Once it's fixed, you can add more cards.
I don't think element type play any important role here as the problem seems to be more relevant to the prescribed boundary conditions. -
May 8, 2023 at 6:04 pm
minchunh
SubscriberHi Armin,
I only applied *BOUNDARY_PRESCRIBED_MOTION_SET at first but the issue showed up so I added BOUNDARY_SPC. Thanks anyway, I will keep looking into it.
-
May 8, 2023 at 6:16 pm
Armin_A
SubscriberNo problem Min-Chun.
While you investigate the model, it is worth checking that the generated set includes all the nodes at the one end of the specimen. Also, try applying a velocity (instead of displacement) boundary condition by changing VAD from 2 to zero in the *BOUNDARY_PRESCRIBED_MOTION_SET card and providing a velocity curve to the model. I usually get better luck with velocity BCs for tensile test simulations.
-
May 8, 2023 at 6:43 pm
Andreas Koutras
Ansys EmployeeHi all,
Some examples that may help with the modeling of coupon tests are available here:
https://www.dynaexamples.com/introduction/intro-by-a.-tabiei/tension
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- explicit dynamics
- Explicit dynamics ERRORS
- turning simulation
- getting zero maximum and minimum stress value in explicit analysis
- How to figure out impact force in Explicit Dynamic Analysis
- Running an explicit dynamics simulation on a composite plate
- How do get Full values instead of just minimum and maximum ?
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- Euler Domain Restricting Simulation
- Which analysis to use for dynamic and quasi-static compression of auxetic structures?
-
5242
-
3299
-
2469
-
1308
-
988
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.