TAGGED: ansys-cfx, fluid, hydrodynamic
-
-
July 3, 2023 at 7:37 pm
Sebastian Sarabia
Subscriber -
July 4, 2023 at 8:32 am
Rob
Ansys EmployeeI suspect it's covered here, https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/fluid-statics/ Putting hydrostatic into the box marked "Search" may give you additional materials.
-
July 4, 2023 at 7:44 pm
Sebastian Sarabia
SubscriberHi Rob, Thanks for taking your time to respond. I have reviewed the link you shared with me. I have been able to get pressure profiles consistent with the problem, but have found that no matter what operating pressure I use, the results are all similar and the velocity profiles do not vary. I'm testing every 10 meters deep. (Pressure operating 1 bar, 2 bar, 3 bar, 4 bar)
-
July 5, 2023 at 6:49 am
NickFL
SubscriberWhat is the boundary condition you have at the inlet? Is it a velocity or a pressure?
The inlet pressure boundary condition is a total gauge pressure, meaning this is measured against the operating pressure that you are using. Therefore if you define the pressure as 1 [bar], this is actually 2 [bar] absolute (assuming default opeating pressure). When you change the opeating pressure to 2 [bar] the inlet pressure would also adjust to have the value of 3 [bar]. Maybe this is why the contours look identical.
If you defined the inlet as a velocity, the absolute pressure at the inlet should increase.
-
July 5, 2023 at 12:34 pm
Sebastian Sarabia
SubscriberHi Nick, In the BC I have pipe velocity input and tidal current velocity input on the left, outlet pressure on the right and outlet pressure at the top, floor on the bottom.
I tried using operating pressure 2, 3, 4 bar leaving all gauge pressure at 0, then I tried leaving operating pressure at 0 and only using the gauge pressure for the pressure outputs for 2, 3, 4 bar, velocity contours all gave similar.
Should I use gauge pressure for velocity inputs?
I am looking for velocity contours for flow dispersion at different depths but there is almost no difference in the results I got.
-
-
-
July 5, 2023 at 2:24 pm
NickFL
SubscriberLet us talk a bit of theory here first. If we have a fixed velocity, we will compute a flow field that has this velocity inlet condition. The computed solution will give us the pressure at the inlet. Now look back at the equations we are solving. Where does the pressure come into play? Hint, it really doesn't (for simple cases). It is the pressure GRADIENT that drives the flow.
With that in our minds, let us return to your question. If you change the operating pressure, what are you doing? You are simply scaling the pressure up to whatever depth you are at. The pressure and velocity fields will be the same. What will be different is the absolute pressure field, but this is going to be simply whatever the difference is between the given operating pressures.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
-
7584
-
4434
-
2951
-
1422
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.