-
-
February 9, 2023 at 11:43 pm
Aakriti Srivastava
SubscriberI am plotting twin rod TDR with respect to different distance of radiation boundary from the structure and getting different result. Is there any relation between radiation boundary and impedance calculation? Please let me know.
-
February 15, 2023 at 12:38 pm
Praneeth
Ansys EmployeeHi Aakriti,
Thank you for reaching out and your patience is much appreciated.
Kindly provide more information to help us serve you better:
- Which solution type you are using in the HFSS design type?
- Is the radiation boundary assigned to a box object or to an open region?
- Why you want to vary distance from radiation boundary distance from the structure?
The minimum distance between the radiating element and the radiation boundary should be at least quarter wavelength.
Please provide screenshots of your model setup and you can also use tags which helps in providing faster response.
Best regards,
Praneeth. -
February 16, 2023 at 10:09 pm
Aakriti Srivastava
SubscriberI am using HFSS driven terminal solution type.
Radiation boundary is assigned to the dielectric material surrounding the structure.
Actually with different radiation boundary distnace from the structure I was getting different value of characteristic impedance from the TDR plot. So was curious what should be the distance of radiation boundary from the structure.
Please find the screenshort for your reference and help me with distance of radiation boundary from the structure.
My structure if simulation is twin rod in HFSS 3D and it is surrounded by the dielectric.
Hope this make my question more clear. Thanks
-
February 20, 2023 at 5:46 am
Praneeth
Ansys EmployeeHi Aakriti,
The radiation boundary is implemented to abosorb any incident radiations and is best suited for normal incidence. This will only be effective if you ensure sufficient distance between the radiating element and the boundary. It is suggested to have atleast quarterwavelength distance between the two. I am wondering why you were using this boundary in your model.
Please let us know what kind of analysis you were trying to make:
- Is your structure working like a radiation source upon excitation?
- what type of excitation you are using?
- do you want to vary the distance from the radiation boundary as part of your analysis?
Best regards,
Praneeth.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- simulation completed with execution error on server
- How to export Ansys Maxwell simulation results for post-processing in matlab or in .csv file
- Maxwell, HFSS or Q3D?
- Unable to assign correctly the excitations in a coil
- Signing up as ANSYS Support Coordinator
- Running ANSYS HFSS on the HPC (it runs on Linux only)
- Intersect errors with model with complex structure
- Running ANSYS HFSS on multiple nodes on SLURM based cluster
- Error
- HFSS: reset marker legend dimensions.
-
3744
-
2573
-
1821
-
1236
-
594
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.