-
-
October 24, 2018 at 9:18 am
Adidash97
SubscriberIs it mandatory to apply velocity conditions on all walls for formulating a Multiple reference model?. What is the difference between stationary wall motion and absolute wall motion with zero RPM -
October 24, 2018 at 9:25 am
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeStationary wall settings is always relative to the adjacent cell zone. Setting the wall to Moving and using zero RPM you will need to set whether it relative to absolute system or just relative to the adjacent cell zone. If the adjacent cell is rotating and you set Stationary wall then the wall will be rotating relative to the absolute system. If you want the same but using "Moving Wall" option then use "Relative to Adjacent CEll zone" and give 0 RPM.
-
October 24, 2018 at 11:02 am
Keyur Kanade
Ansys EmployeeHello,
Perfectly explained by Amine.
Also you can have a look at following.
Also, please like the answers which have helped you move forward and in the end, once your issue is resolved, please mark the most appropriate solution (most useful advice) as 'Is Solution'. This will help others who are using this thread to find answers to similar questions.
Regards,
Keyur
-
December 8, 2018 at 4:16 pm
-
December 9, 2018 at 6:37 pm
Raef.Kobeissi
SubscriberIs it possible to upload the file to understand better the simulation?
Regards
-
December 10, 2018 at 5:02 am
Keyur Kanade
Ansys Employeeplease insert some images of mesh and set up explaining the situation.
it is the warning message which need attention or can be ignored depending on your setup.
-
December 18, 2018 at 11:28 am
-
December 18, 2018 at 11:33 am
Adidash97
SubscriberSo as per the solution given by abenhadj that the stationary wall setting is relative to the adjacent cell zone, the impeller wall which is rotating can be assigned as a stationary wall. Then also I still receive the message I had posted earlier "Review wall motion. Stationary wall motion adjacent to cell zone detected". What is wrong with the boundary conditions?
-
December 18, 2018 at 1:51 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeeThe cell zone around the impellor is set to rotate (I think you've done that). The impellor wall should be moving at zero speed relative to that zone. The outer casing may need setting to stationary if the rotating zone also touches it.
-
December 18, 2018 at 4:49 pm
Adidash97
SubscriberBut why am I receiving that message? What is the correct way of providing a stationary boundary condition? Is it "stationary wall" or "Moving wall with zero velocity"? I am really confused with these two?
-
December 18, 2018 at 5:55 pm
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeIf the wall is not moving in absolute system then set it as moving in absolute system and give zero angular velocity.
Stationary wall settings is always relative to the adjacent cell zone. Setting the wall to Moving and using zero RPM you will need to set whether it relative to absolute system or just relative to the adjacent cell zone. If the adjacent cell is rotating and you set Stationary wall then the wall will be rotating relative to the absolute system. If you want the same but using "Moving Wall" option then use "Relative to Adjacent Cell zone" and give 0 RPM.
-
December 18, 2018 at 7:00 pm
Adidash97
SubscriberI did the same but getting the message.
-
December 18, 2018 at 9:18 pm
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeThen ignore the warning message already mentioned here at first and check results afterwards. Check what has been suggested thoroughly. Default behaviour is stationary relative to a adjacent cell zone. Walls of rotating impeller can be then set stationary relative to impeller zone or rotating with zero rpm relative to the same zone.
Global stationary wall which does not rotate better made through zero rpm relative to absolute frame. -
October 29, 2019 at 2:24 pm
yalin
SubscriberThank you all for the great discussion. Let's say we have two concentric cylinders and the inner cylinder is rotating while there is fluid in between (rotor and stator can be a good example for this). To calculate the heat transfer through the fluid between cylinders we can have two scenarios:
1- We use moving reference and rotate the whole inner cylinder.
2- Only define the rotating wall for the OD of the inner cylinder.
Could you please explain the difference between these two approaches in the results?
Thank you.
-
October 29, 2019 at 2:44 pm
Rob
Ansys EmployeePlease post the results, what difference are you seeing?
-
January 15, 2020 at 7:57 am
srivastavatanuj
Subscriber
But why am I receiving that message? What is the correct way of providing a stationary boundary condition? Is it "stationary wall" or "Moving wall with zero velocity"? I am really confused with these two?
Try initializing from the absolute reference frame. I just found this thing. It may help.
Cheers,
Tanuj
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
-
2524
-
2066
-
1279
-
1096
-
457
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.