March 19, 2020 at 4:06 pmmarrom15Subscriber
i am trying to design a torsion testing machine modeled in Static Structural that looks as follows
The green brackets are bonded to the blue cylinder which rotates around the red base. Remote force in Y direction is applied to the smaller cylinder bonded to the brackets.
At first i used body to body revolute joint between the base and the blue cylinder, but the solving time was over 30 min. Equivalent stress was also high on the brackets (around 110 MPa) but i didn t know what value to expect.
Then i copied the system and tried frictionless contact between the 2 bodies and added an 0 mm displacement on the blue cylinder in Z direction just to be safe. Equivalent stress went down to around 60 MPa to the brackets along with cutting solving time to half.
All bodies except the little cylinder are flexible and large deflection in on (non-linear problem).
I thought that the 2 models were equal, and expected similar stress. Does anyone know the reason this happened? Which is the right way to model this problem?
Thanks in advance.
March 19, 2020 at 6:30 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
A revolute joint consists of a spider of elements from one face, to a central coordinate system, and another spider of elements from that coordinate system out to another face.
A contact consists of nodes checking for penetration of element faces.
They are going to give very different stress results because they are very different connections.
March 19, 2020 at 8:55 pmmarrom15Subscriber
Thanks for your reply Peter,
may i ask you which connection in your opinion describes the model more realistically?
I think i understand the difference but does that justify double the difference in stress?
Although both connections do the job of revolution, from the images and your explanation above it seems that the contact is closer to reality.
Do you agree?
March 20, 2020 at 12:14 ampeteroznewmanSubscriber
The joint can pull on the whole circle in a way that can increase stress. The frictionless contact can only push on one side and is more realistic.
March 20, 2020 at 10:45 pmmarrom15Subscriber
Thank you for your help
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Colors and Mesh Display
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- Massive amount of memory (RAM) required for solve
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.