March 1, 2023 at 6:42 amSushil SharmaSubscriber
I am trying to perform a static analysis of a wind turbine blade. I used share topology for the common joint line of the sections I used to model the blade. When I try to do the static analysis, it shows the joint status as far open. How can I solve this issue? I wanted to resolve it using a pinball radius, but it didn't work. Here attached the blade 3D and joint information table.
March 1, 2023 at 2:09 pmAshish KhemkaForum Moderator
Can you remove the regions that are already sharing topology from the region of contact? Regions that are already sharing the topology need not be included in contact definition.
March 1, 2023 at 3:43 pmSushil SharmaSubscriber
If that's the case, then why does the program automatically generate the contact region? In my case I use shared topology to share the common edge, Does that mean I didn't have to assign any contact definition?
March 1, 2023 at 4:15 pm
March 2, 2023 at 1:40 pmSushil SharmaSubscriber
Can we do the convergence study of the composite ACP(pre-preg) model? I assigned the layup information and did the static analysis, and tried to study the convergence in deflection output, but it did not offer the convergence tool. I tried changing the material to aluminium, and it worked. Please explain why the convergence tool doesn't work for a composite material assignment.
March 2, 2023 at 2:18 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
How will knowing why the convergence tool doesn't work help you?
March 2, 2023 at 3:02 pmSushil SharmaSubscriber
I want to check whether the outputs are within the convergence limit. I tried it following the adaptive convergence tutorial, but in my case (material defined as composite ACP), there isn't a convergence tool to track the refinement. When I use the same model (with homogeneous material), I can use a convergence tool. How can I perform a convergence study of my model with material as ACP composite? Is there any separate way for composite material?
March 2, 2023 at 4:52 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
You can do a convergence study manually by using Mesh Sizing controls to set the element size in the neighborhood of the peak stress. Solve the model four or five times to get four or five points on a Peak Stress vs Element Size chart.
The element size changes should have a constant ratio. A good ratio is between 1.5 and 2.0
For example, using a ratio of 2.0, if your initial element size was 1 m then you would remesh to get a series of models at element sizes of 1.0, 0.5, 0.25 and 0.125 m.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- No longer possible to import f3d with 2023?
- line bodies and surface body shared topology
- How to chang unit in Ansys Discovery 2023?
- ANSYSLI Exited or could not read server port ANSYSLI_FNE_PORT
- SpaceClaim Script: Selection by FilterByBoundingBox
- Assignment of revolute joint
- Max/min over time results in AIM
- Axisymmetric model – Rubber seal
- To change language in Ansys Discovery
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.