Tagged: integrationpoint, shell281


May 29, 2022 at 12:23 ammpirkleSubscriberI am using the SHELL 281 element with 5 integration points, and I find that the stress results at the TOP, MIDDLE, and BOTTOM layers are exactly the same. Why is this? Does ANSYS take the average of the 5 integration points, and use that as the same result for the TOP, BOTTOM, and MIDDLE layers?
Here is some of the code I am using:
ET,1,SHELL281
KEYOPT,1,8,1
KEYOPT,1,1,1
Thanks!

May 29, 2022 at 4:33 ampeteroznewmanSubscriberIf the shell elements were subjected to Inplane loads only and no bending loads, then you would expect the stress in the shell to be equal top to bottom.

May 30, 2022 at 3:29 pmmpirkleSubscriberYes, the loading is inplane only with no bending.
If I am using the SHELL 281 element with 5 integration points (SECDATA,t,1,0.0,5), while also using reduced integration (ET,1,SHELL281), I should wind up with only 4 integration points through the thickness of the SHELL 281 element. Correct?
In the event that the SHELL 281 elements were subjected to bending loads, how does ANSYS arrive at the stress results for the TOP, MIDDLE, and BOTTOM layers if 4 integration points (reduced integration) are used? Is the MIDDLE the result of the average of the 4 integration points, or perhaps the average of the 2 integration points immediately above and below the midplane of the element?
Thank you!
Thank you so much!

June 1, 2022 at 10:38 ampeteroznewmanSubscriberIntegration points are InPlane which is independent of the number of Layers through the thickness, which is in an orthogonal direction. You will still have 5 layers whether you use Reduced Integration or not.
Stress in the Middle layer is based on the InPlane (also called Membrane) loads.
Stress in the Top and Bottom layers is based on the Bending loads vectorially added to the InPlane loads. That means if the sheet has inplane tension, and by bending has more tension on the top and less tension (or compression) on the bottom, then the stress is higher on the top than the bottom.

September 24, 2022 at 3:14 pmmpirkleSubscriber
The loading is InPlane only (uniaxial tension test). If I understand correctly, the question becomes:
For InPlane loading, when using reduced integration on the SHELL281 element with 5 integration points, there will still be 5 integration points through the thickness of the element. Because the loading is InPlane only, one expects that the stress results will be the same no matter which layer in the shell element they are taken from (TOP, MIDDLE, or BOTTOM). When using the Options for Output in ANSYS and selecting the MIDDLE LAYER of the SHELL281 element, does ANSYS ordinarily compute the maximum stress output from the MIDDLE LAYER as the maximum of the 5 integration points, the average of the 5 integration points, or the extrapolation of the stress to the nodes?
Thank you so much!


October 22, 2022 at 3:11 pmmpirkleSubscriber
The loading is InPlane only (uniaxial tension test). If I understand correctly, the question becomes:
For InPlane loading, when using reduced integration on the SHELL281 element with 5 integration points, there will still be 5 integration points through the thickness of the element. Because the loading is InPlane only, one expects that the stress results will be the same no matter which layer in the shell element they are taken from (TOP, MIDDLE, or BOTTOM). When using the Options for Output in ANSYS and selecting the MIDDLE LAYER of the SHELL281 element, does ANSYS ordinarily compute the maximum stress output from the MIDDLE LAYER as the maximum of the 5 integration points, the average of the 5 integration points, or the extrapolation of the stress to the nodes?
Thank you so much!

 You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
 Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
 Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
 Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
 An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
 What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
 whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
 The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
 Colors and Mesh Display
 User manual
 material damping and modal analysis

3670

2544

1749

1226

580
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.