-
-
September 19, 2023 at 11:32 pm
Seyed Mohammadhossein Enjaviarsanjan
SubscriberHello,
I am facing an issue related to defining a simulation time for measuring the quality factor of a high-Q cavity.
I employ a dipole cloud to excite the resonant modes within the cavity and, using a high-quality analyzer integrated into FDTD (Finite-Difference Time-Domain) simulations (you can find more information at https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360041611774-Quality-factor-calculations-for-a-resonant-cavity), I attempt to determine the quality factor.
My question pertains to the simulation time. Given that my resonator possesses an exceptionally high-quality factor, ranging between 400,000 and 1.2 million, I encounter challenges in reaching the auto-shutoff level, for instance, 1e-5 or 1e-6.
Through several trials, I have observed that in some cases, a duration of 1000 femtoseconds (fs) is not as reliable, but there isn't a significant difference between 2000 and 1000 fs.
My assumption was that, since the method measures the slope of energy within the cavity and we are utilizing a time-domain approach to calculate the intrinsic quality factor, it should not be heavily dependent on the simulation time.
I would greatly appreciate your guidance on determining an adequate simulation time, especially since energy depletion does not occur within a reasonable timeframe. Additionally, if you could advise on what would be a reasonable auto-shutoff level, that would be immensely helpful.
Thank you for your assistance.
-
September 20, 2023 at 6:19 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys Employee"My question pertains to the simulation time. Given that my resonator possesses an exceptionally high-quality factor, ranging between 400,000 and 1.2 million, I encounter challenges in reaching the auto-shutoff level, for instance, 1e-5 or 1e-6."
You should NOT persue reaching the auto-shutoff level, for instance, 1e-5 or 1e-6. Both the findresonance and FFT methods can give pretty accurate prediction from limited, relatively short time signals. Actually in order to get accurate result the signal should be large enough.
For the FFT method, you will need to make sure the signal strength in log scale vs time be a perfect straight line.
What is the best section of the time signal? we should avoid the initial part of the source signal, which does not contain resonant information; and we also should to remove the later part, since its strength is low. Please check the script in the analysis group.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Questions about the calculation of the cross-polarization conversion efficiency of metasurface
- Error on Lumerical device
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Finding your Ansys (or Lumerical) account number
- Lumerical – error message when trying to open from Linux terminal
-
7742
-
4502
-
2957
-
1449
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.