-
-
September 27, 2017 at 11:19 am
admin
Ansys EmployeeWhat should the size of the MRF be for axial fans (e.g. underhood cooling fans)?
-
October 17, 2017 at 4:59 am
admin
Ansys EmployeeIt is a common problem in underhood environments to become very congested, causing the MRF used to model the cooling fans to become very small. A common question to ask is how small one can make the MRF. Some facts about MRF: 1. Non-axisymmetric stationary walls cannot touch or be inside the MRF. Otherwise, it will produce false velocities. 2. If an axisymmetric stationary wall does touch and is inside the MRF (e.g. part of the shroud), you must explicitly declare it as stationary in absolute reference frame in the wall boundary condition. This includes wall-shadows as well. MRF Size: MRF in general works OK provided that the flow is either: (1) Circumferentially uniform at the interface or (2) If circumferential non-uniformities in the flow exist, but the flow must primarily passes one way through the interface. In the real underhood situation, the fan is inserted partially or fully inside the cylindrical portion of the shroud. Since the cylindrical portion of the shroud is axi-symmetric, we can make its walls touch the cylindrical portion of the MRF interface. Thus, the cylindrical portion of the MRF will be a wall. It will have wall and wall-shadow—make sure the one adjacent to the MRF cell zone is declared as stationary in absolute reference frame. Making the cylindrical portion of the shroud a wall will prevent any flow passing it. If that portion of the shroud is not fully axi-symmetric in reality, one could—in the preprocessor—change it to be. By doing this, we are moving away from reality, so make sure that the modification is not significant. In the case of a plane shroud, which is typically used in the experiment when the fan curve is obtained, there is a significant recirculation near the fan tip. If you increase the radius of the MRF boundary away from the recirculation, you will see better prediction. But in the circular faces of the MRF boundary, the flow is only one directional—there are no recirculation at any of these two circular faces. Thus, the accuracy is not degraded as you decrease the MRF size in the axial direction.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
-
2642
-
2110
-
1335
-
1110
-
461
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.