

June 2, 2023 at 8:49 pmNikai RyosukeSubscriber
Hello everyone, I am doing a steadystate thermal simulation which involves a linear motor that drives grinding machine and the motor has a cooling pipe installed inside a coil slider (=heat source).
The flow is laminar and heat transfer via forced convection occurs in internal flows of grinding oil. It is assumed that there is constant heat flux which is transferred to the grinding oil per unit area. From there I theoretically derived a linear equation describing the temperature profile across the fluid walls, which I use in Fluent. After that, I import the temperature result from Fluent into steadystate thermal
Figure below shows all thermal load and constraints that I have defined so far. The only load is in this case the internal heat generation from the coil slider. The last two constraints are applied on the fluid.
So my question is, have I already overconstrained or put too much redundant thermal constraints on the fluid? If yes, which one should choose? I was thinking about to suppress the heat flux option since the imported temperature profile has the heat flux quantity included based on the equation below, where T_m is the bulk fluid temperature and q_s is the constant heat flux.
Also if you looked in the model a solid cooling pipe is also included and it is also in contact with the grinding oil fluid. So should I extra define something like fluidsolid interface region in the steadystate thermal? Any explanations and suggestions are highly appreciated.
Nikai

June 5, 2023 at 2:14 pmAdriano ZafforaAnsys Employee
Hello Nikai,
at the boundary of your fluids domain, always think of the type of information you would need to transfer:
 if temperatures, you are getting the "solution" of the thermal problem, hence in a parallel to structures calculation it is worth as a displacement boundary condition
 if Heat Flux, you're setting a Newmann problem, hence the boundary is free to change the Temperature to chace for an equilibrium.
So to spot overconstraints in a steadystate thermal simulation you just need to check if there is any change in the flux of hear in your model: e.g. the CFD simulation is not forcing the model to a state that is obviouse at the beginning of the simulation itself.
Please review this course for some additional information on Steadystate Thermal.
Applications of SteadyState Conduction  Ansys Courses
Regards
Adriano 🙂

 You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
 Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
 Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
 Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
 User manual
 An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
 What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
 The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
 whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
 Defining rigid body and contact
 Colors and Mesh Display

7656

4468

2957

1429

1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.