May 11, 2023 at 3:19 pmJoao VilasSubscriberHi Everyone,Currently, I am doing my thesis, where I am studying the behavior of a door system to different types of loads. I am using beams elements, and I am having some problems defining contacts and not over constraining the model. The door system that I am studying is made of 3 different materials, 2 polymers and 1 steel having 5 different sections inside a solo profile, as I will show in the figures below.When I extract the beams, each beam of the door origins 5 beams (one for each section of the profile) so I need to define contacts between those beams.It is also important to know that every door in the planet has 2 frames, one that is movable (when You open the door,the door opens) and one that is fixes to the ground and to the walls, and where the movable frame connects and closes.My first question is?Should I define a beam contact between every beam of a profile?Secondly, these are the errors that show up in my simulation1- A remote point using the beams formulation was defined that the pilot node and connection topology causes coincident nodes. To avoid a zero length beam element, an additional node was created to tie the nodes together. As a result, the stiffness of the connection may be slightly reduced as that location.2- Joint are being used in the current analysis with large deflection turned off. Thus, only linearized joint behavior will be considered....3-One or more MPC contact regions or remote boundary conditions may have conflicts with other boundary conditions or other contact or symmetry regions.In the first simulation it is not expected to study the behavior of the hinges so, I established a joint between the 2 frames.The objective is to study the deformation of a door if a force is applied to the movable frame in the up horizontal frame. So I applied 5 forces of the same magnitude one to each one of the 5 beams created for the up frame.
May 16, 2023 at 7:02 amAshish KhemkaAnsys Employee
Are you using a remote point to join two beams at a common node location? If yes, then this might be causing the first warning. You can try using the node merge option.
(305) ANSYS Mechanical: Node Merge - YouTube
You can turn on large deflections to see the stiffness update during the analysis.
To Use Large Deflection or Not, That Is the Question - PADT (padtinc.com)
On third warning: MPC Contacts in ANSYS - Yes or No? - FEA Tips
Please see if the above links help.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- User manual
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- material damping and modal analysis
- Colors and Mesh Display
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.