March 9, 2023 at 11:01 pmMiguelSubscriber
Two analysis of the same system: same geometry, same materials, same connections, same mesh, same settings, same boundary conditions,... just one difference:
case 1: point-displacements are enforced where forces are supposed to be applied in order to make convergence easier. Once solved (successfully) reaction forces for the imposed displacements are obtained (503N and 550N respectively)
case 2: these forces are applied in the same points instead of the enforced displacements and the system is also solved successfully.
Surprising outcome: results (deformations, stresses,etc.) are completely different in each case! How can that be?
March 13, 2023 at 4:32 pmDaniel ShawAnsys Employee
Are the displacement patterns identical or do the imposed displacements prevent some motion that is not prevented by the applied forces? For example, is a surface free to rotate with the applied forces but restrained from rotating with the applied displacements. If so, the stiffenesses are different.
March 13, 2023 at 5:13 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
Daniel made a good point about the difference between a displacement on an area vs a force on that same area. However, Miguel said the entity was a point. So Miguel, please show details about the enforced displacement.
March 13, 2023 at 9:24 pmMiguelSubscriber
Yes, it is a scoped point but Daniel´s hint was absolutely right and showed me the problem:
the force is applied to the point in one step and then withdrawn in the next one (step1: 0 to 500N, then step2: 500 to 0N) but I did the same with the point displacement without realizing that being a non-linear situation the system remains in a deformed state before the force has come back to 0 in step2 while with the "returning" enforced displacement, this one obligues the point to go back to its original position, thus forcing the structure beyond its "natural" final position. In fact, results after step1 were coincidents in both approaches, only in step2 the results diverged. With this explanation, now everything seems to fit in so I feel confident this is what happened. Would you also agree with it?
Thanks a lot to both of you for your help.
- The topic ‘strange case’ is closed to new replies.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- Colors and Mesh Display
- User manual
- material damping and modal analysis
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.