-
-
November 7, 2018 at 1:48 pm
Vanderbezi
SubscriberHello,
I have a problem as i am new to Ansys. I am doing an Analysis of a crankschaft to determine its torsional stiffness under different boundary conditions.
is the "Transient structural analysis" the right analysis if i want to simulate the crankshafts working conditions for a period of 720° with all the forces from the pistons? or are other analysis types like "dynamic analysis" more appropriate for this use?
regards,
Bezi
-
November 7, 2018 at 2:53 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberHello Vanderbezi,
If you are new to ANSYS, I recommend you begin with a Static Structural analysis. You can apply the peak force from a piston onto the bearing face of the crankshaft at the correct angle, and repeat this for each piston. The end of the crankshaft that goes into the transmission would have a fixed rotation for the reaction torque to be developed.
Regards,
Peter -
November 7, 2018 at 7:42 pm
Vanderbezi
SubscriberHello Peter,
thank you for your response. a few questions furthermore are:
1- Do you mean with "fixed rotation": DOF = 0 ?
2- If I allow only rotation on 1 axis for the main bearings(Journals) and set the other 5 dof to 0, would that be considered over-constraining the model for the stiffness analysis?
Regards,
Vanderbezi
-
November 7, 2018 at 9:55 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberHello Vanderbezi,
You can use two Bearing Supports to hold the crankshaft at the bearing faces that connect it to the engine block. Two bearings spaced along the crankshaft take away 4 DOF.
If you create a Remote Displacement on the end of the crankshaft that connects to the gearbox, you can set the axial displacement to zero and the rotation about the axis to zero, so with those 2 DOF added to the 4 DOF from the bearings, you have an exactly constrained crankshaft.
Regards,
Peter -
November 7, 2018 at 10:11 pm
Vanderbezi
SubscriberHello Peter,
thank you for your answers. one last question:
in a transient analysis with a remote displacement at the gearbox end with the angle at given time steps. and with the loads on the crankschaft(right angle and force). is that then considered over-constraining the model?
regards,
Bezi
-
February 25, 2019 at 9:03 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberNo, that is not overconstrained.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Colors and Mesh Display
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
-
2616
-
2098
-
1321
-
1108
-
461
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.