Fluids

Fluids

Turb-Kinetic-Energy missing in Transient solution

    • blackbaddl
      Subscriber

      Hi everyone, 


      I encountered a problem while postprocessing on HPC System. When switching from steady-state to transient solving I do not get the turb-kinetic energy any more. I am not shure wether this is a technical issue or I did not get the concept completely yet. 


      I downloaded the last time step .dat file and tried it by hand. The same, no turb kinetic energy. What is the problem ? 


      These are my solver settings:


       



      /define models solver pressure yes 


      /define operating-conditions gravity no


      /define models energy yes no no no no 


      /define models viscous kw-sst yes


      /define models viscous curvature-correction yes


      /define materials change-create air , yes incompressible-ideal-gas , no yes sutherland , , , , no no no


      ;


      ;


      ;---Solver Settings---


      ;Pressure Velocity Coupling Scheme [20] ?


      ;; 20 for SIMPLE


      ;; 21 for SIMPLEC


      ;; 22 for PISO


      ;; 24 for Coupled


      /solve set p-v-coupling 21


      ;


      ;Convective discretization scheme for Pressure [10]


      ;; 10 for Standard


      ;; 14 for PRESTO!


      ;; 11 for Linear


      ;; 12 for Second Order


      ;; 13 for Body Force Weighted


      /solve set discretization-scheme pressure 14


      ;


      ;Convective discretization scheme for Momentum [0]


      ;; 0 for First Order Upwind


      ;; 1 for Second Order Upwind


      ;; 2 for Power Law


      ;; 4 for QUICK


      ;; 6 for Third-Order MUSCL


      /solve set discretization-scheme mom 6


      ;


      ;Convective discretization scheme for Energy [0]


      ;; 0 for First Order Upwind


      ;; 1 for Second Order Upwind


      ;; 2 for Power Law


      ;; 4 for QUICK


      ;; 6 for Third-Order MUSCL


      /solve set discretization-scheme temperature 6


      ;


      ;Convective discretization scheme for Turbulence Kinetic Energy [0]


      ;; 0 for First Order Upwind


      ;; 1 for Second Order Upwind


      ;; 2 for Power Law


      ;; 4 for QUICK


      ;; 6 for Third-Order MUSCL


      /solve set discretization-scheme k 6


      ;


      ;Convective discretization scheme for Turbulence Dissipation Rate [0]


      ;; 0 for First Order Upwind


      ;; 1 for Second Order Upwind


      ;; 2 for Power Law


      ;; 4 for QUICK


      ;; 6 for Third-Order MUSCL


      /solve set discretization-scheme omega 6


      ;


      ;---set under-relaxation factors when divergence occurs---


      /solve set under-relaxation temperature 0.6


      /solve set under-relaxation turb-viscosity 0.6


      ;/solve set under-relaxation omega 0.6


      ;/solve set under-relaxation pressure 0.6


      ;/solve set uner-relaxation mom 0.4


      ;/solve set under-relaxation density 0.8


      ;/solve set under-relaxation body-force 0.7


      ;


      /solve set high-order-term-relaxation enable? yes


      ;


      /solve initialize compute-defaults all


      /solve initialize hyb-initialization


      ;/solve iterate number-of-iterate


      /solve set timestep 0.01


      /solve dual-time-iterate 150 300


      ;


       



      By the way the solution converged by itself and the residuals of  K and omega existed of course


       


      Thank you in advance

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee
      Are u post processing in Fluent,? What is missing? You are able to solve TKE and you its residual.
    • blackbaddl
      Subscriber

      Yes I do postprocessing in fluent. Basically everything affecting turbulance is missing in postprocessing. I was able to solve the case perfectly and because of the residuals I assumed that turbulance values should have been callculated.


      The are the residuals of the last timestep I downloaded from the HPC to look into that by hand.


       



        iter  continuity  x-velocity  y-velocity  z-velocity      energy           k       omega     time/iter


       12759  1.2295e-03  2.2280e-06  1.6802e-06  2.1652e-06  9.5707e-17  2.5318e-05  4.3953e-05  0:07:09  234


       12760  1.1969e-03  2.1917e-06  1.6538e-06  2.1311e-06  9.5311e-17  2.4826e-05  4.3069e-05  0:07:05  233


       12761  1.1655e-03  2.1563e-06  1.6278e-06  2.0977e-06  9.5589e-17  2.4347e-05  4.2149e-05  0:07:01  232


       12762  1.1354e-03  2.1216e-06  1.6023e-06  2.0649e-06  9.5669e-17  2.3879e-05  4.1312e-05  0:06:57  231


       12763  1.1060e-03  2.0877e-06  1.5775e-06  2.0329e-06  9.5496e-17  2.3423e-05  4.0452e-05  0:06:54  230


       12764  1.0772e-03  2.0543e-06  1.5530e-06  2.0013e-06  9.5454e-17  2.2977e-05  3.9660e-05  0:06:51  229


       12765  1.0499e-03  2.0216e-06  1.5290e-06  1.9703e-06  9.5616e-17  2.2542e-05  3.8836e-05  0:06:49  228


       12766  1.0232e-03  1.9897e-06  1.5054e-06  1.9400e-06  9.5554e-17  2.2117e-05  3.8086e-05  0:06:46  227


      !12767 solution is converged


       12767  9.9754e-04  1.9584e-06  1.4823e-06  1.9103e-06  9.5626e-17  2.1703e-05  3.7303e-05  0:06:44  226


      Flow time = 1.5s, time step = 150


       



      So the goal is to do a basic postprocessing on HPC System because each of these time steps has 35 GB of data.


    • blackbaddl
      Subscriber


      This is completely missing. All I changed is solving transient and not steady state. All other settings are the same

    • DrAmine
      Ansys Employee
      That is weird can you start a dummy case just to check if you face same issue
    • blackbaddl
      Subscriber

      Sorry for the very late reply, 


      the HPC system was down for quite a while due to maintance and I have not been at the project for some time because of being sick.


       


      However, yes there is the same issue in a dummy case.... It is very weird. We decided to stay with steady state simulations because there is not a real added value in transient solutions for our project at this moment. But this might be worth looking into in more detail some time in the future.....


       


      I faced another big big problem with Fluent on HPC. I am not able to mesh. This a lot worse for us at the moment as we are trying to implement an efficent workflow "backwards". (Just the order of implementation and development) 
      But I will post another question with details on it. Would be great if somebody is looking into that.


       


      Thank you  

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.