-
-
March 13, 2023 at 7:46 am
Mohd. Azarulsani Md. Azidin
SubscriberHi, i try to find propagation loss using Mode Expansion monitor in FDTD module. but i gotten 0 loss so far.
i am running a simple straight waveguide with the parameters as below:
design size: 100um x 100um
SU8 - core (width 4um, height 4um)
Air - cladding
SiO2 - buffer - 1um
Si substrate - 5um
is there a proper way to place the monitor? i tried putting at the input or in the middle, it gave the same result = ZERO loss.
or i should i should MODE Eigenvalue solver to get the loss reading?
but i wanted to check loss at a certain waveguide area eg. at input vs output
-
March 14, 2023 at 12:35 am
Amrita Pati
Ansys EmployeeHello,
If the material you're using as the core (SU-8) is lossless then ideally the propagation losses in a straight waveguide should be 0. So, I think your results are correct.
I would also like to add that if you want to determine the propagation loss of a mode then you don't have to simulate the structure in time domain or use a Mode Expansion monitor. You can edit the mode source, go to mode selection and choose user select to find and select the desirable mode. Once you have selected the mode from the list of calculated modes, you can obtain modal properties including the propagation losses.
You can also visualize the properties of the selected mode.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Amrita -
March 15, 2023 at 3:28 pm
Mohd. Azarulsani Md. Azidin
SubscriberHi Amrita,
it seems that i have finally out the main culprit to my problem earlier. I was using METAL BC instead of PML.
So, when i ran PML, i finally gotten the proper loss readings.
But i was wondering, some of the modes showed a NEGATIVE loss.
Does this means, there is an error in the calculation/design somewhere or perhaps the material does show negative loss on certain modes?
thanks for your help.
-
March 15, 2023 at 3:35 pm
Amrita Pati
Ansys EmployeeHi,
Great to know that you're getting the expected results. If your material fitting has no gain then the negative values of losses are most likely due to artifacts of the boundary conditions. You can try placing the PML further away from the structure. These modes are unphysical modes and they mainly do not affect the results of the guided modes. So, if you're getting the expected results you can ignore these modes.
Regards,
Amrita
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Error on Lumerical device
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Transmission results greater than one
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Is there a Lumerical script command to output the Simulation and Memory requirements?
- Ansys Insight: Convergence issues in CHARGE
-
3622
-
2502
-
1729
-
1222
-
578
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.