-
-
March 2, 2022 at 6:41 am
taosif_alam
SubscriberI am simulating the temperature and velocity distribution of a laser powder bed fusion process with a moving laser heat source. I have attached the temperature distribution and velocity vector figures (full view and zoomed view). Only half domain is simulated due to symmetric nature of the moving laser. The top surface is a powder region and laser heat source moves over it. At the top surface, it has only convection and radiation heat loss boundary condition. The top surface also have Marangoni stress boundary condition the surface tension gradient is negative. This means that the velocity flow direction will be opposite to the direction of the temperature gradient. The picture of temperature gradient vector directions is also attached which shows they are directed inward towards the high temperature region. As the laser scans through the top surface, the powder region melts and creates a melt pool which is bounded by the liquidus line. The melting and solidification modelling done with enthalpy porosity method inherent in ANSYS Fluent. The A_mush value is taken 10^7 as suggested by the literature. The powder region has very low thermal conductivity and once it melts the its thermal conductivity switches to thermal conductivity of the bulk material which is much higher that that of powder region. The density of the bulk material and powder region is assumed to be same and Bousinessq approximation is also considered. The velocity directions seen from the picture, is directed outwards from the center of the laser active region. But, just across the edge of the liquidus and solidus line we can see very small velocity flow which is directed inwards and marked by the dotted line. This inward velocity is unwanted as the temperature gradient is also inward there. Can anyone please give me any reason, what is the cause of the inward velocities at the edge of the liquidus temperature line? Also, there are some velocity flow in the solid powder region which is also unwanted. Can someone please suggest me how can I get rid of those. Please note, that the mesh is poly-hexcore and mininum size is 3.5 um. For solving the problem, the continuity, momentum and energy equations are iterated until residuals become 10^-6 for each time step.
March 2, 2022 at 1:50 pmKarthik R
AdministratorHello We are answering your question here. Please respond to the thread below.
How to resolve unwanted velocity flow created at the edge of the melting temperature line ÔÇö Ansys Learning Forum
To avoid any further confusion, I'm going to close this thread.
Karthik
Viewing 1 reply thread- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Ansys Innovation SpaceEarth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
Trending discussions- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
Top Contributors-
2564
-
2080
-
1299
-
1106
-
459
Top Rated Tags© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-