August 13, 2021 at 11:05 amAli_shSubscriber
I am using ANSYS 2021 R1 to calculate energy release rate for mode III.
The ANSYS fracture tool distribution of energy release rate is different when I obtain the energy release rate from nodal value directly. They are totally different at one side; moreover, there is a small difference between the values of Fracture tool and my calculation.
I have attached here both the values and graph.
Direct VCCT is the result of Fracture tool. In nodal VCCT, I export nodal force and displacement directly and calculate VCCT using the same formula that ANSYS uses.
Does anyone have any suggestions about the root of this inconsistency and how I can solve it?
Thank you.September 13, 2021 at 5:46 pmDavid WeedAnsys Employee
For the last calculation, is the reaction force recorded as zero on that node?
September 15, 2021 at 3:06 pmAli_shSubscriberHi @davidW Actually no. The value of force and displacement are not zero at that node.
September 15, 2021 at 3:10 pmDavid WeedAnsys EmployeeThanks, just curious as to how the value came out to zero at that node. Can you give a bit more detail about the loading and general model setup?
September 16, 2021 at 9:33 amAli_shSubscriber
Thank you for your answer.
I modeled DCB under mix mode I & III loading condition. I attached the geometry here.
Indeed, the problem is not limited to the value of edges merely.
I have attached here the distribution of mode I and mode III energy release rate. The fracture tool cannot obtain energy release rate at the edges and center of the specimen for both mode I & III when I use a refined mesh. However, the nodal vcct works perfect. (Nodal VCCT: First, extract the nodal force and displacement and calculate the energy release rate myself)
In my opinion, this is a postprocess error, because I have to arrange(sort) the data to calculate the energy release rate myself.
I hope you can help me to solve this problem. My colleagues ask me to switch to ABAQUS instead of working with ANSYS to analyze the fracture behavior.
September 16, 2021 at 4:22 pmDavid WeedAnsys Employeethanks for the additional detail. Would it be possible to scale down the model (mesh-wise) and then post your ds.dat code, leaving out extraneous details, as a forum post/comment here (unfortunately, we don't allow users to share actual files as attachments)? If we can get the APDL commands which have produced the model, we can take a closer look.
October 22, 2021 at 11:11 amOctober 22, 2021 at 1:49 pmAli_shSubscriber
Another problem that I have with the fracture tool comes from the local coordinate system of the crack tip.
I explain it here.
For example, the first picture shows the ERR for mode I and III for the defined coordinate system. However, clearly, this is not correct. (in both images, the right is the mode I, and the left is mode III)
By rotating the coordinate system, the value becomes acceptable somehow. (the edge and center values are not satisfactory)
By definition, both of them must work; nevertheless, the fracture tool cannot calculate the ERR in the first case.
Indeed, the crack-normal and the crack-tangent are well defined by each method.
November 10, 2021 at 12:54 pmAli_shSubscriberHello
It has been some days, and I could not find almost anything in this forum. Can anyone have a discussion on this, please?
November 26, 2021 at 12:56 pmAli_shSubscriberDear Would you please take a look at the file and help me with the issue that I have?
Bests Ali Shivaie
November 28, 2021 at 10:49 pmDavid WeedAnsys Employeegoing to check in with our developers on this and get back soon.
February 25, 2022 at 12:01 amDavid WeedAnsys Employeethe local crack cs appears to be flush with the crack front. Can you move it slightly, so that it is still on the open side of the crack, but not flush with the crack front?
February 25, 2022 at 11:16 amMarch 2, 2022 at 6:07 amDavid WeedAnsys Employeethis looks good. This is stated in the help, but it's a bit obscure: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/account/secured?returnurl=/Views/Secured/corp/v221/en/wb_sim/ds_crack_overview.html
For thePre-Meshed CrackandArbitrary Crackobjects, the origin of the coordinate system must be located on the open side of the crack.
Viewing 13 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Colors and Mesh Display
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
Top Rated Tags
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.