Tagged: bearing-load, virtual-topology
-
-
March 12, 2022 at 2:51 pm
albin.linderstam
SubscriberHello,
All the holes of the 3D-model are divided into two surfaces when importing the model, so I tried to simplify the mesh by combining surfaces of holes using Virtual Topology.
It seemed to work great and the mesh looked better. However, I could not use the Bearing Load to this combined surface. It was possible to apply different constraints to these surfaces, but not Bearing Load.
Whenever I tried to select the surfaces and pressed OK, it told me to select surfaces once again, and again,...
So I had to remove the Virtual Topology to Apply the Bearing Load.
Do anyone know why this is the case?
Since the "hole surface" is splitted into two halves automatically when I import the model (CatPart), the mesh does not look perfect at the location where these two halves meet, hence why I wanted to use Virtual Topology.
Regards, Albin
March 12, 2022 at 3:29 pmpeteroznewman
SubscriberI always open geometry in SpaceClaim and use the tools on the Repair tab called Extra Edges and Split Edges to remove both of these. That will automatically replace each split hole with a single cylindrical surface with an unsplit edge on each end. Once you do that, Bearing Loads will work properly.
If you are using a direct CAD interface and want to parametrically update geometry from CAD, then you can't do what I described above.
March 14, 2022 at 6:47 amalbin.linderstam
SubscriberThank you for your answer!
March 14, 2022 at 7:05 amalbin.linderstam
Subscriberfrom your answer, is there any reason to use Virtual Topology? Since it can be solved in SpaceClaim without having issues applying loads.
March 14, 2022 at 3:37 pmpeteroznewman
SubscriberFirst choice is fix things in SpaceClaim.
Virtual Topology is often useful and doesn't cause problems, and it can save the time compared with going out to SpaceClaim and back.
March 14, 2022 at 4:54 pmalbin.linderstam
SubscriberWhen I tried to open the model in SpaceClaim, the edges in the holes weren't there, so I could not merge the surfaces.
March 14, 2022 at 8:46 pmpeteroznewman
SubscriberMaybe you have the checkbox ticked that says to Improve Geometry on Import. That would do it automatically for you.
March 15, 2022 at 10:37 amalbin.linderstam
SubscriberYou are correct. Thank you.
When I loaded the geometry in SpaceClaim, saved it and imported it to Ansys, I received the following messages:
Is this something that I need to change? I went back to SpaceClaim and changed to "mm", same as in mechanical.
The other message, is that simply due to improves geometries?
March 15, 2022 at 1:34 pmpeteroznewman
SubscriberThe length unit change is a one-time warning, so after you check your model, you won't see that next time you open SpaceClaim and update the model with revised geometry.
Viewing 8 reply threads- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Ansys Innovation SpaceEarth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
Trending discussions- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Colors and Mesh Display
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- User manual
Top Contributors-
2564
-
2080
-
1299
-
1106
-
459
Top Rated Tags© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-