July 5, 2019 at 1:13 pm
July 6, 2019 at 11:52 amGaurav SharmaSubscriber
I am discussing this problem with the team and will get back to you soon.
Thanks for your patience.
July 8, 2019 at 1:57 pmGaurav SharmaSubscriber
In Discovery AIM, the formulas proposed by Cebeci and Bradshaw based on Nikuradse’s data are adopted to compute the wall roughness effect. (ref: T. Cebeci and P. Bradshaw. Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York. 1977.)
The inputs required here are Roughness Height and Roughness Constant that helps in computing the roughness function which ultimately quantifies the downward shift (deltaB in image attached below) of logarithmic mean velocity distribution near the rough walls.
Roughness Height: The default roughness height is zero, which corresponds to smooth walls. For the roughness to take effect, a non zero value must be specified. For a uniform sand-grain roughness, the height of the sand-grain can simply be taken as roughness height . For a non-uniform sand-grain, however, the mean diameter would be a more meaningful roughness height. In case the distribution data is not available but Ra (surface Roughness) value is known, Roughness height is calculated as:
Roughness Height = 2*Ra.
Roughness constant: Choosing a proper roughness constant is again dependent on the type of distribution and has experimental evidence. The default roughness constant (0.5) was determined so that, it reproduces Nikuradse’s resistance data for pipes roughened with tightly-packed, uniform sand-grain roughness. One needs to adjust the roughness constant when the roughness to be modeled departs much from uniform sand-grain.For instance, there is some experimental evidence that, for non-uniform sand-grains, ribs, and wire-mesh roughness, a higher value (0.5-1) is more appropriate. Unfortunately, a clear guideline for choosing this constant for arbitrary types of roughness is not available.It is an empirical constant that can only be computed experimentally and there is no equation for calculating this value.
To summarize, roughness height is calculated based on the grain size distribution of the wall and as long as the distribution is uniform, a roughness constant of 0.5 is experimentally observed to be a good input value. Any deviation of grain structure to non uniform, would require to use roughness constant = 0.5-1 but there are no guidelines/formula available for choosing the most appropriate value and it remains an empirical constant.
With the calculation approach of Discovery AIM known, I hope I was able to answer your question.
Thanks & Regards,
July 8, 2019 at 6:25 pminfoSubscriber
Thank you Gaurav_ANSYS
Could you suggest a reliable source for ‘roughness constant’ database of civil engineering materials, e.g. steel plate, trapezoidal sheet, concrete etc.?
July 9, 2019 at 7:20 amGaurav SharmaSubscriber
I am afraid we do not have any such guidelines.
I would again like to mention that roughness constant has more to do with even/uneven surfaces. Irrespective of the material (say steel or concrete), if the grain size of wall is more even, i.e. if the grains are of similar size without much deviation, a value of 0.5 should be used. If the grain sizes are uneven, a higher value must be used. In nutshell, roughness contact doesnt depend on size of grain or the material of wall but depends upon the uniformity of grain.
As I said, for any particular wall surface, experimentally obtaining the roughness constant might be the only way as roughness constant is a empirical value. However you can start with any approx value between 0.5-1 and keep tweaking the same unless you get desired results.
Thanks & Regards,
July 9, 2019 at 10:33 aminfoSubscriber
Hi Gaurav_ANSYS ,
Thank you for answers, now it seems clear.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- How to work with STL file?
- Rotate tool in ANSYS Design Modeler
- section plane
- Using Symmetry in DesignModeler and Expanding the Results
- ANSYS FLUENT – Operation would result in non manifold bodies
- drawing a geometry by importing a table of points
- material properties
- Coordinates orientation
- “contact pair has no element in it.” how to resolve this problem
- Parameters not imported into Workbench 18.2 from Solidworks/Inventor
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.