September 21, 2020 at 4:26 amianster1Subscriber
I am having trouble solving for wall shear stress within my simulation, with my results consistently off by a factor of 1.5 compared to the theoretical calculations. Originally, I thought this issue had to do with a coarse mesh, however, even after plotting 1.6 million elements, the results are still the same. Below is a detailed setup of my experiment.
The study is a 10 cm in length by 10 cm wide by 2 cm high rectangular volume.
I used various mesh densities ranging from 1e-3 to 5e-4 m. I also used a bias mesh on the height (shown in the picture below) in other runs.
I defined the bottom as a no slip condition and the walls having a specified shear of zero.
I set the velocity inlet at a consistent 0.04 m/s and an outlet measuring total pressure. The working fluid is water with the boundary made from aluminum. I ran residuals from 1e-3 to 1e-5 (results were also attempted in double precision with residuals at 1e-11) with a negligible change to the results.
The wall shear was measured using a line at the bottom of the plate, running the full distance from the intel to outlet, centered between the two walls (see picture below). I exported a graph with wall shear on the y-axis and the distance along the Z axis plotted on the x-axis and compared it to the theoretical within excel.
If you have any ideas why wall shear would be off by a factor of 1.5 in a very basic simulation, please let me know what I can do to my simulation to make it more accurate. I also posted an image of the formula for calculating the theoretical data. The excel shows data from fluent results in blue (1000 data points) and the simulated values in orange with wall shear on the y-axis and distance from the inlet plotted on the x-axis.September 21, 2020 at 10:12 amOctober 7, 2020 at 11:00 pmianster1SubscriberI manipulated the reference values to fit the experiment, however, they did not improve the inaccuracy. nNovember 17, 2020 at 10:04 pmianster1SubscriberThe issue was fixed by making the domain larger (taller), which eliminated the speed-up of the free stream velocity.nViewing 3 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Heat transfer coefficient
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error in cfd post
Top Rated Tags
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.