May 24, 2018 at 8:32 amgishnutrSubscriber
I am a Fluent user. I have never tried CFX.
1.What are the differences in using CFX and Fluent?
2. Are they used for any specific kind of problems? If yes, why those problems are for CFX/Fluent?
May 24, 2018 at 4:38 pmraul.raghavSubscriber
There is always something new to learn .
1. They are both equally good CFD solvers. Preference primarily depends on the physics of the flow and the user's familiarity with the solver. Below are some main differences that come to my mind right away thinking about the two solvers.
- CFX cannot handle a true 2D mesh. It can handle a pseudo-2D mesh which would be a 1 element thickness 3D mesh. While Fluent can handle 2D meshes with no problems.
- Fluent uses a cell-centered approach while CFX uses a vertex-centered approach. The point being is, Fluent is capable of handling polyhedral mesh and cutcell meshes while CFX sticks to just the traditional tetra and hexa mesh topologies.
- CEL (CFX Expression Language) is also used with CFD-Post. So its easier to define algebraic equations and monitor them during your run with CFX. Fluent needs UDFs for customization which can complicate things for beginners. Fluent has post-processing capabilities of its own while CFX needs a dedicated post-processor.
- Mesh Adaption capabilities are weaker in CFX compared to Fluent. In CFX, "Adaptive meshing is available for single domains with no GGI interfaces and limited physics".
- Fluent is continuously worked upon by the engineers at Ansys and there is a significant improvement made with every new release. CFX definitely lacks the focus that Fluent gets from the developers, in my opinion.
- Simulation acceleration with a GPU is possible in Fluent, while it doesn't benefit CFX.
2. Both the solvers can handle most of the flow physics with some limitations for the both. I believe turbomachinery is one field where CFX has been proving its worth. Fluent is preferred for high Mach number flows (supersonic and hypersonic flows). Fluent has a lot more tutorials easily accessible, which makes learning it a tad bit easier. CFX has limited tutorials available making the learning process a bit harder for a beginner.
Hope this helps!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Suppress Fluent to open with GUI while performing in journal file
- Floating point exception in Fluent
- What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?
- Heat transfer coefficient
- Getting graph and tabular data from result in workbench mechanical
- The solver failed with a non-zero exit code of : 2
- Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model
- Time Step Size and Courant Number
- Mesh Interfaces in ANSYS FLUENT
- error: Received signal SIGSEGV
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.