September 16, 2020 at 11:40 pmKaiAnsys EmployeeSometimes, people get different results when using CONTA178 vs. CONTA174. Here I explained the cause of the difference. Feel free to comment if you have any questions.nNode-to-node contact (CONTA178) has a big limitation in the fact that contact is only detected between two nodes I and J of CONTA178. Thus, one CONTA178 can?t interact with another CONTA178 ? only the two nodes of a single CONTA178 can interact with each other. Thus, for any situation where you expect sliding, you shouldn?t use CONTA178. (For CONTA174, one CONTA174 can interact with any TARGE170 in the same contact pair, so that is why it is more flexible. One way to think of it is that the ?node I? of CONTA178 is contact, ?node J? of CONTA178 is target, so it?s like we separate CONTA178 into two groups of elements CONTA174 and TARGE170 if we were to compare the two approaches.)nThis begs the question, if finite sliding is not supported, why do we have CONTA178? There are many situations we can imagine where two parts are in contact (not bonded ? one surface can lift off from the other surface) without finite sliding. CONTA178 requires a similar mesh pattern between the two surfaces, but it is extremely computationally efficient. There is no algorithm requiring searching for which contact detection points may come into contact with which target surfaces, computation of contact ?normal? and ?tangential? directions, smoothing computations, etc. Thus, if you don?t have large sliding and have the same mesh pattern between two surfaces, then CONTA178 is very attractive due to its computational efficiency. However, because we do need the same mesh pattern, that is why you don?t see CONTA178 much in practical usage (and explains why it?s not supported in Mechanical directly).n
September 25, 2020 at 12:05 pmKarthik RAdministratorThank you for sharing these benefits & limitations with the forum. This is very useful. nKarthikn
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Understanding Force Convergence Solution Output
- Colors and Mesh Display
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- Massive amount of memory (RAM) required for solve
- What is the difference between bonded contact region and fixed joint
© 2022 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.