December 11, 2020 at 12:45 pmHarsihilZLHZSubscriberif its ductile material then also most of them considers Maximum Principal Strain in EXPLICIT ANALYSIS.n
December 12, 2020 at 11:47 ampeteroznewmanSubscribernBecause max principal strain best represents tension, not compression, and materials most easily fail in tension.nEquivalent von-Mises strain is for both tension and compression, but material is not tearing apart in compression.n
- The topic ‘why in Explicit analysis the Maximum Principal Strain is considered for results comparison?’ is closed to new replies.
Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- Maximum Time Step
- Error 20211 (STR+211) while 2D impact analysis
- ls dyna has no solver
- LS-Dyna Prestressed
- Whereabouts of the LS-DYNA program manager
- License error : NO SUITABLE FEATURE FOUND
- Total Contact Force and Contact Pressure
- Contact not working in Ls-Dyna and Ls-Dyna ACT (WB)
- Element direction..
- TIED_CONTACT for Shell Elements – Gap between Shell-Shell and Shell-Solid
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.