June 3, 2021 at 9:47 pmAlejalo88Subscriber
Why the stresses obtained from the FEMs with shell elements are higher than the stresses obtained from the FEMs with solid elements at some locations and lower at other locations.
The question is related to the finite element analysis of welded tubular joints and the stresses located at the Chord Crown, Chord Saddle, Brace Crown and Brace Saddle locations.
Please see the documentation attached including the Ansys code for two of my models.June 4, 2021 at 7:19 am1shanAnsys EmployeeANSYS staff are not allowed to download attachments, please insert inline images of your model to help support your query. Also, have you performed a mesh convergence study and made sure that the mesh is fine enough? If yes, how much is the difference between both cases? There are bound to be some differences because of the assumptions made in 2D elements, but if the geometry is thin enough the mesh accurately captures the geometry, the difference shouldn't be very high. Also, if there are transverse or out of plane loads make sure to use at least 3 elements across the thickness of the model.
June 4, 2021 at 10:55 amAlejalo88SubscriberHi Ishan Thanks for your reply!!!!!
I will try to explain my question with pictures then:
The subject is about the stress analysis of a welded tubular T joint in Ansys Mechanical APDL as seen on the picture below (the thickness of the tubular members is 8mm). A unit axial load is applied at the top of the brace (vertical member). A symmetry boundary condition is applied at the XY and YZ planes (only a quarter of the T joint is modelled). A fixed support is applied at the end of the chord member (horizontal member).
I have 2 finite element models:
The first model meshed with SHELL181 elements, the mesh density is adjusted until I get a mesh convergence of less than 3% between the nodal and the element solutions at the location of highest stress.
3 shell sections are specified:
A first shell section type is applied to the brace member (vertical member) specifying a thickness of 8mm, 5 integration points and a midplane section offset.
A second shell section type is applied to the chord member (horizontal member) specifying a thickness of 8mm, 5 integration points and a top plane section offset.
A third shell section type is applied to the geometry representing the weld specifying a thickness of 7.82mm (average thickness of the weld geometry along the tubular joint intersection), 5 integration points and a midplane section offset.
The axial load is applied using TARGE170 and CONTA175 elements at the top of the brace (vertival member) as shown on the picture below (force-distributed constraint):
The fixed support is applied using TARGE170 and CONTA175 elements at the end of the chord member (horizontal member) as shown on the picture below (coupling constraint):
The second model meshed with SOLID186 elements, I have 5 elements through the thickness of the tubular members and I get a full convergence between the nodal and the element solutions at the location of highest stress.
The axial load is applied using TARGE170 and CONTA174 elements at the top of the brace (vertival member) as shown on the picture below (force-distributed constraint):
The fixed support is applied using TARGE170 and CONTA174 elements at the end of the chord member (horizontal member) as shown on the picture below (coupling constraint):
I am reading the 1st principal stresses at the locations as shown on the picture below for both finite element models.
The results show me that at the chord saddle and at the chord crown the stresses for the solid elements are lower than those for the shell elements.
But at the brace saddle and at the brace crown the stresses for the solid elements are higher than those for the shell elements.
The deformed shape of the structure looks like on the picture below. It is apparent that on the chord member I am having more bending than membrane behaviour while on the brace member I am having more membrane than bending behaviour (Am i correct?).
And so my question is which element should give higher stresses in which behaviour.
Is it correct to assume that the shell elements give higher stresses in bending and the solid elements give higher stresses in membrane behaviour?????
Thank you so much in advance Alejandro Santacruz
June 4, 2021 at 1:28 pmAlejalo88SubscriberSorry I forgot to mention the actual values obtained from the models:
Shells chord saddle: Solids chord saddle:
178.73(10^-4) MPa 174.3(10^-4) MPa
Shells chord crown: Solids chord crown:
66.933(10^-4) MPa 65.705(10^-4) MPa
Shells brace saddle: Solids brace saddle:
90.343(10^-4) MPa 102.12(10^-4) MPa
Shells brace crown: Solids brace crown:
13.725(10^-4) MPa 13.987(10^-4) MPa
As you can see the values pretty much agree for both elements but this is a thesis and I have to explain the variations.
June 4, 2021 at 2:05 pmAlejalo88SubscriberShells chord saddle: - Solids chord saddle:
178.73(10^-4) MPa - 174.3(10^-4) MPa
Shells chord crown: - Solids chord crown:
66.933(10^-4) MPa - 65.705(10^-4) MPa
Shells brace saddle: - Solids brace saddle:
90.343(10^-4) MPa - 102.12(10^-4) MPa
Shells brace crown: - Solids brace crown:
13.725(10^-4) MPa - 13.987(10^-4) MPa
Viewing 4 reply threads
Ansys Innovation Space
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Simulation World 2022
Check out more than 70 different sessions now available on demand. Get inspired as you hear from visionary companies, leading researchers and educators from around the globe on a variety of topics from life-saving improvements in healthcare, to bold new realities of space travel. Take a leap of certainty and check out a session today here.
Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.Trending discussions
- How to calculate the residual stress on a coating by Vickers indentation?
- Solver Pivot Warning in Beam Element Model
- Errors – Reinforced Concrete Beam
- An Unknown error occurred during solution. Check the Solver Output…..
- The solver engine was unable to converge on a solution for the nonlinear problem as constrained.
- whether have the difference between using contact and target bodies
- Massive amount of memory (RAM) required for solve
- Cannot apply load on node
- Saving & sharing of Working project files in .wbpz format
- Colors and Mesh Display
Top Rated Tags