-
-
August 3, 2023 at 5:22 am
Altair45
SubscriberGood Day,
I calculate the transmission in coupled resonator optical waveguide with phase-shifted bragg grating. A few days ago, I posted my transmission result with some errors that -2.5dB loss is confirmed in the pass bandwidth and wavelength shift. As following the advice, I tried to optimize the result by changing the simulation time, PML layer, and mesh size. But, there are no noteworthy changes in the data like the attached graph.I check the DFT monitor, located in every phase-shifted region so that the transmission is decreased when the light propagates every grating.
What is the reason for the gradual loss? When the phase shifter is present, no loss in the data.
Kind regards, -
August 3, 2023 at 7:13 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeThis might be a more theoretical question. As you mentioned, with the phase shifter, the transmission is good. This might be the reason people use it.
When light is not well confined inside the waveguide, scattering causes losses. Thus the longer the device the smaller the transmission. You can verify this by using top and bottom as well as side monitors.
You may also try EME in MODE, as it is more efficient for long repeated structures. Please refer to this example:
https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360042304334-Bragg-Grating-full-device-simulation-with-EME
-
August 6, 2023 at 6:20 am
Altair45
SubscriberThanks for your advice. So I'm trying to investigate the effective index by calculating it both theoretically and simulationally.But, I wondering if the MODE simulation is suitable for the coupled resonator optical waveguide (CROW) based on phase-shifted bragg grating.As I know, the MODE is analyze the object only in 2D, but the CROW structure is varying for the z-axis due to the phase shifter as I attached images below. -
August 9, 2023 at 12:00 am
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeYou will need to have a math definition for "the effective index" for such devices.
FDE in MODE solves modes in a waveguide cross section.
When it is ring resonators cascated, it is cavity so you will need to use 3D FDTD to simulate such cavity and then extract the result and derive the effective index if possible.
We do not have any similar examples.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Boost Ansys Fluent Simulations with AWS
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) helps engineers design products in which the flow of fluid components is a significant challenge. These different use cases often require large complex models to solve on a traditional workstation. Click here to join this event to learn how to leverage Ansys Fluids on the cloud, thanks to Ansys Gateway powered by AWS.

Earth Rescue – An Ansys Online Series
The climate crisis is here. But so is the human ingenuity to fight it. Earth Rescue reveals what visionary companies are doing today to engineer radical new ideas in the fight against climate change. Click here to watch the first episode.

Ansys Blog
Subscribe to the Ansys Blog to get great new content about the power of simulation delivered right to your email on a weekly basis. With content from Ansys experts, partners and customers you will learn about product development advances, thought leadership and trends and tips to better use Ansys tools. Sign up here.
- “Import optical generation” or “delta generation rate”?
- Why am I getting “process exited without calling finalize”, and how do I fix it?
- Using a license file on a new license server
- Ansys Insight: Diverging Simulations
- Error: addfdtd is not a valid function or a variable name
- Questions about the calculation of the cross-polarization conversion efficiency of metasurface
- Error on Lumerical device
- Ansys Insight: About override mesh in FDTD: its use and settings
- Finding your Ansys (or Lumerical) account number
- Lumerical – error message when trying to open from Linux terminal
-
7742
-
4502
-
2961
-
1449
-
1322
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.